Web Only / Features » May 16, 2016
Hunting the Hunt Commission
The private meetings that led to the creation of superdelegates have never been published or made public—until now.
The proceedings of the Hunt Commission have never been published.
Despite holding a nationwide series of presidential primaries and caucuses in which millions of voters participate, the Democratic Party still maintains a system of 712 party insiders who often have the final say on who the nominee is. Why did the party choose to institute such a system? To answer that, you need to go back to the Hunt Commission, which in 1982 invented the “superdelegate.”
The proceedings of the Hunt Commission have never been published. In These Times gained access to documents housed in the National Archives, excerpts of which are reproduced below.
The pages here represent only a sample of the total material looked at by In These Times, which itself makes up a small percentage of the total proceedings of the Commission. Nevertheless, the documents presented here provide an exclusive window into the deliberation and motivations that led to the creation of superdelegates.
In These Times has been selected to participate in NewsMatch—the largest grassroots fundraising campaign for nonprofit news organizations.
For a limited time, when you make a tax-deductible donation to support our reporting, it will be matched dollar-for-dollar by the NewsMatch fund, doubling your impact.
if you like this, check out:
- Want More Proof of MSNBC’s Anti-Bernie Bias? Look at Last Night’s Debate.
- Why “High Hopes” Is the Perfect Dance Song for the Buttigieg Campaign
- 9 Stats That Show the Tax Code Favors the Ultra-Rich
- Centrist Pundits Assume Voters Agree with Them. Polling Tells a Different Story.
- Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren Represent Very Different Political Traditions