Win a subscription to In These Times by taking our short new survey!
University of Illinois at Chicago Online Certificate in Nonprofit Management
PrintDiscuss
Culture » November 4, 2005

Empire Made Easy

By Phyllis Eckhaus

Banish those nasty guilt twinges over America’s ambitions to empire. Getting a jump on the holidays, Thomas P.M. Barnett is marketing a feel-good guide to conquest and capitalism, a sequel to his bestseller, The Pentagon’s New Map. In Blueprint for Action, the Esquire editor and former Defense Department strategist declares that we’re doing the world a favor by bombing our way to global free enterprise.

Brash and breezy, Barnett’s plan for world conquest comes complete with its own video game vocabulary: The industrialized West is the Core. The Third World is the Gap. The aim of the game is to “shrink the Gap” by deploying the Leviathan, America’s “high-speed, high-lethality and high-precision” warfighting capacity, “a force for global good that … has no equal.”

Through conquest, occupation and occasional diplomacy, America will cure the world’s ills. This transformation will be achieved through the miracle of globalization, or “connectivity,” Barnett’s code for capitalism, which magically produces universal affluence, pluralism and democracy.

By contrast, Barnett believes, “disconnectedness defines danger,” a mantra he repeats with the confidence of someone who confuses alliteration with meaning. He simultaneously asserts that his plan for world domination will eliminate terrorism—because ultimately, everyone will have a cell phone and laptop and live happily ever after—and acknowledges that in the short run, “regime change doesn’t exactly reduce your terrorist pool.”

No matter. Against all evidence to the contrary, Barnett insists that the U.S. invasion of Iraq was a wonderful thing because it somehow flushed out terrorists by immiserating the masses: “In the end, it was almost impossible for the Iraq occupation to go too badly, because the worse it became, the more it transformed the region.” The reality that Iraq never threatened us, that it was a secular state—and a relatively globalized one at that—pales next to the glory of Shock and Awe, the first strike in grand global conflagration: “The Big Bang in the Middle East was … about speeding the killing to its logical conclusion,” that “logical conclusion” being lasting world peace and prosperity.

Unfortunately, he’s not kidding. And he’s got plenty of fans across the political spectrum. Barnett’s recipe for war-to-end-all-wars is a sort of stone soup, chock full of ingredients to whet liberal appetites. Good-guy Barnett hints that he opposes the Patriot Act and regrets abuses at Guantánamo and Abu Ghraib. He advocates for “transparency” (when he’s not drooling over covert operations). He gives lip service to internationalism and urges greater use of the International Criminal Court (though not for the United States—he seems to suggest we deserve permanent exemption from prosecution because we’re pure of heart). Moreover, he lays claim to a passionate desire to better the world, asserting that since 9/11, America understands that “there is a world of pain beyond the expanding global economy. I think we see one-third of humanity with noses pressed against the glass, wondering what it will take for them to come inside and enjoy the same sense of security and economic opportunity.”

Keep your eyes on the prize, Barnett exhorts. By killing the few, the many will get iPods and maybe a chance to host the Olympics. American power and privilege are intrinsically beneficent. Heck, it would be “misguided in the extreme” for Americans to give up our gas guzzling because reducing our dependence on foreign oil would diminish our influence on the Middle East, to that region’s great detriment.

Though he pretends otherwise, in Barnett’s cosmos, democracy doesn’t count for much. He cheerfully suggests that America forge a strategic alliance by giving Iran the Bomb, cites Venezuela as a “rogue state” ripe for American invasion, and anticipates hooking up with China, India and Russia, “military partners who won’t run at the sight of blood, argue incessantly over the rights of ‘enemy combatants,’ or see their governments collapse every time the terrorists land a lucky strike back home.” He carefully refrains from characterizing terrorists as implacable foes—someday we’ll want to negotiate peace with them.

There’s only one group that earns Barnett’s enduring enmity: antiwar protestors. By obstructing American empire, they’re deemed “most guilty of denying the Gap positive integration with the Core.” Antiwar activists condemn the Gap to instability, Barnett claims, thus impeding economic development and imposing “death and destruction, as well as … both disease and distressed refugees.” Funny, I thought war did that. Alas, all of Barnett’s Orwellian doublespeak cannot be dismissed as too stupid to do damage. After all, look who’s president.

  • Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
  • Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!
  • Or win a subscription to In These Times by taking this short survey!
Phyllis Eckhaus is an In These Times contributing editor who has written essays and book reviews for the magazine since 1993, covering everything from the history of Mad Magazine to the economics of terrorism. Her work has also appeared in Newsday, The Nation, the Guardian (U.S.) and the Women's Review of Books, among other publications. Trained as a lawyer and social scientist, with degrees from Yale, Harvard and New York University, she works in nonprofit management and lives in New York City.

More information about Phyllis Eckhaus
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    ....“Alas, all of Barnett’s Orwellian doublespeak cannot be dismissed as too stupid to do damage. After all, look who’s president….”

    It’s the ‘vice’ and ‘rove’ beside the bewildered ‘dubya’ that scares me…but what Barnett spews is no less than what is preceived to be the direction of the USA to date. Bravado from the bully is nothing new for us trying to mind our own business here in Canada. We got roped into Free Trade only to discover billions of dollars in taxation on our softwood lumber that the tradedeal reniging American negoitiators refused to return and dismissed the findings when the panel’s rulings were made against them. Ever the bully, ever the megalomaniac, like the church dictating outmoded assumptions making them laws and forcing them on the terrified public by assertions of evil while they rob them of resources to support their habit of telling the world how to act.  Don’t get me started on what I think of Barnett and the present BushCo/Cheneyburton boondoggle heaped on the backs of America. Yep, can smell the vermin all they way to Canukistan. namasté

    Posted by neilemac on Nov 4, 2005 at 6:17 PM

    ....a feel-good guide to conquest and capitalism…...

    ....American power and privilege are intrinsically beneficent….

    No kidding, eh?

    As a fellow Canuckistanian I also worry about our neighbour to the south. Free Trade disputes are the least of our worries when the USA seems to be on the proverbial warpath.

    Posted by David in Canada on Nov 9, 2005 at 2:44 AM

    Click Here for Canuckistan information

    Posted by David in Canada on Nov 9, 2005 at 2:49 AM

    .... fellow Canuckistanian   .. or is it Canuckistani ? Sounds better.

    Posted by David in Canada on Nov 9, 2005 at 2:50 AM

    It’s embarrassing being an American.  What the hell happened to all those “Mom, Apple Pie” values we learned about in school?  Our leaders are a bunch of terrorists and too many kool-aid drinking Americans are so abysmally ignorant and downright stupid to cheerfully and vigorously follow and support their criminal leadership.

    Posted by Codger on Nov 9, 2005 at 1:03 PM
  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 13 posts.

Appeared in the November 21, 2005 Issue
Also by Phyllis Eckhaus
  • A Wingnut in Sheeps Clothing
    It's deluded to imagine that human beings are rational creatures. Fearmongering works, which… morePosted on January 30, 2007
  • The Northern Slave Trade
    The hidden history of slavery in New York calls myths of American morality into questionPosted on January 6, 2006
  • Hiroshima: The Falsehood Fallout
    As the 60th anniversary of Hiroshima arrives, two recent books examine the history of atomic weaponsPosted on August 6, 2005
  • Terrornomics
    Why can't we come to terms with terrorism? "Terrorism" is like "pornography"--we think… morePosted on June 28, 2005
  • The Uses and Abuses of Race
    Race facilitates rule. If race did not exist, the powers-that-be would have had… morePosted on May 11, 2005
If you like what you're reading, why not help pay for it?
IN THESE TIMES COMMUNITY MEMBERS
University of Illinois at Chicago Online Certificate in Nonprofit Management