Help In These Times raise $10,000 in three weeks! Donate now!
PrintDiscuss
Views » September 16, 2008

United We Fail

By Joel Bleifuss

Whoever is elected president, private insurers are gearing up to make sure that change entails no change -- with the help of progressive allies who are now lending their names to lowest common denominator reforms.
Share   Facebook Digg del.icio.us Newsvine   StumbleUpon Reddit Furl Propeller

This election year, the bandwagon to fix the healthcare system barrels along. On board is a motley crew of self-styled reformers, the agents of change. But not all change is created equal. And nowhere is this truer than with healthcare reform.

We’ve been here before, in 1994, when the Clintons’ attempts to cure a sick healthcare system came a cropper.

In an interview with The Harvard University Gazette, Theda Skocpol — author of Boomerang, a 1996 book that analyzed why those reform efforts were unsuccessful — said, “As usual, everyone failed to anticipate the conservative ideological crusade against health reforms — yet such crusades have happened every time the issue has come up in U.S. politics.”

Let’s look at some of the crusaders — and their progressive allies — who are again filling our airwaves:

America’s Health Insurance Plans, an industry trade group, has established Campaign for an American Solution to promote “choice.” Meanwhile, the National Coalition on Benefits — a conglomeration of more than 50 corporations and trade associations, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Aetna — is looking to ensure that any change benefits them.

Then there are Families USA and entrenched healthcare industries lobbies like American Hospital Association, which have raised Harry and Louise from the dead and back to the kitchen table. “Healthcare should be at the top of the next president’s agenda,” Harry and Louise tell America in the TV ad. “Bring everyone to the table, and make it happen.”

Most prominent is Divided We Fail, a coalition led by the American Association of Retired People (AARP), with the support of SEIU, the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, the National Farmers Union and Sojourners, among others. Its ubiquitous ads open with a fierce struggle between a red elephant and a blue donkey. Then, in what is meant to be a positive metaphor for bipartisan cooperation, the dust settles and the two animals are fused into a hideous abomination: the purple donkeyphant, a perfect totem beast for the Washington elite.

Divided We Fail promotes a system that provides “healthcare for all” — and continued profits for all coalition members with a vested interest in the current system. Vested interests like AARP, which gets about 60 percent of its revenue from the business of selling supplemental private Medigap policies to worried seniors. Were the healthcare system to really change, that income would be threatened.

It’s little wonder that United We Fail does not mention anything about a single-payer universal healthcare system. According to Physicians for a National Health Program, a single-payer system “would save more than $350 billion per year, enough to provide comprehensive, high-quality coverage for all Americans.”

Yet that option is conspicuously missing.

Whoever is elected president, private insurers are gearing up to make sure that change entails no change — with the help of progressive allies who are now lending their names to lowest common denominator reforms.

Was nothing learned from the 1993-1994 healthcare fiasco?

It is as if our progressive friends, in their haste to earn agents-of-change merit badges, have begun to heed the words of former Vice President Dan Quayle, who said: “My friends, no matter how rough the road may be, we can and we will never, never surrender to what is right.”

  • Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
  • Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!
Joel Bleifuss is the editor and publisher of In These Times, where he has worked as an investigative reporter, columnist and editor since 1986. He is on the board of the Institute for Public Affairs, which publishes In These Times.

More information about Joel Bleifuss
Share   StumbleUpon Facebook Digg del.icio.us Reddit Newsvine Propeller Furl
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    Divided is the way ‘they’ like us.

    This year with the media option of change lite and change little, why throw your vote away with some lessor of the two, and as Dr. Paul and other current and former “third party” (there are far more than three other parties) cast your ballot for the one that makes sense to your own ears and hopes for this nation.

    This issue of health care for American Citizens is great, do you really think the two parties that have given us the current ‘system’ will change it? With every “insurane” company and every other “industry” connected with passing cash and checks around, do you think they want a change? Middlemen only cost you your money without any thing in return. Look into how much these “industies” have paid lobbists to meet with Your representatives,,, have you ever met one representative that supposedly works for you?


    As Dr. Paul has recently said,

    “I hope to get as many votes for Ralph Nader as possible”.

    Dr. Paul is out of this race,,, you decide.

    Posted by MeatwadGetsIt on Sep 16, 2008 at 4:07 PM

    Clean your keyboard Meatwad

    Posted by MeatwadGetsIt on Sep 16, 2008 at 4:09 PM

    I’m truly sorry to see the folks at Sojourners unite what I believed was their cause for social justice with the motivations of those responsible for much of that injustice.

    Equality and greed do not mix.

    Posted by gregsdiary on Sep 17, 2008 at 12:06 AM

    Barack Obama is a Nazi good cop.

    He’s a kinder, gentler place keeper between authoritarian regimes.

    He’s a powerful sedative that allows Americans to keep believing that change is possible within the envelope of representative democracy.

    He’s a fraud.

    FREE AMERICA

    REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY

    Posted by mschlee on Sep 17, 2008 at 1:29 AM

    Well, If the country wants to vote Socialist/Marxist, so be it. That doesn’t mean he is MY President. I didn’t vote for him and never will vote Democrat again. I truly believe this country will now experience an attack that will make 9/11 dim in comparison. God help us.

    Posted by SECurly on Nov 16, 2008 at 3:42 AM
  • extended discussion >>>Continued...

    Discussions with more than 5 comments are continued on our special discussion page to encourage continuity and ease of use. There are currently 6 posts.

Appeared in the October 2008 Issue
Also by Joel Bleifuss
  • Block ’Em, Sock ’Em
    Across the country progressive groups are mobilizing to support legislative initiatives, but to… morePosted on July 9, 2009
  • Buy Back Our Government
    Porn rentals, duck islands and moat-cleaning are among the frivolities British members of… morePosted on June 11, 2009
  • A Specter is Haunting Dems
    Sen. Arlen Specter (D-Pa.) had every reason to free himself from the wing… morePosted on May 12, 2009
  • Bailout Bandits
    In these days of "bank stablization plans" (bailouts for fat cats) and "overseas… morePosted on April 16, 2009
  • Building Utopia
    A new documentary profiles the rise and fall of a Depression-era utopian experiment in the Bronx.Posted on April 13, 2009
If you like what you're reading, why not help pay for it?
IN THESE TIMES COMMUNITY MEMBERS