In his State of the Union address, President Bush asked Congress to reform U.S. immigration laws “to reflect our values and benefit our economy.” But what he calls a new guest worker program, which matches “willing foreign workers with willing employers when no Americans can be found to fill the job,” is a scam Latinos know all too well.
Welcome to Wal-Mart’s Bracero Program.
During the early 20th Century, U.S. companies routinely recruited hundreds of thousands of Mexicans for industrial jobs in the West and the Midwest. Whenever the economy soured, the migrants were rounded up and deported by the trainload. Then came the World War II “Bracero Program,” a scheme to recruit Mexicans for U.S. agribusiness, which led to such terrible abuses that Lyndon Johnson mercifully ended it in 1964.
Remember when the feds accused Wal-Mart last year of illegally employing hundreds of undocumented workers as janitors? Under Bush’s plan, corporations like Wal-Mart won’t have to resort to clandestine exploitation. They’ll hire all the immigrants they want at super-low wages — and it will be legal. Should a guest worker dare demand better treatment, the corporations can simply revoke his certification, triggering immediate deportation proceedings.
It’s no secret that Hispanics comprise a huge share of the 8 million undocumented workers in this country, or that Bush needs a bigger share of the Latino vote to assure reelection. And he will spend from now until November seeking to persuade Latino voters how hard he worked to solve the immigration problem.
But Bush’s bracero program would only create a new permanent American underclass — one with fewer rights than legal residents. Forget the hype about matching “willing workers” and “willing employees” for jobs Americans don’t want. Bush knows, as does the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which immediately endorsed the plan, that the best way to get an American worker to refuse a job is to offer a wage so miserable only a desperate immigrant would take it.I hope you found this article important. Before you leave, I want to ask you to consider supporting our work with a donation. In These Times needs readers like you to help sustain our mission. We don’t depend on—or want—corporate advertising or deep-pocketed billionaires to fund our journalism. We’re supported by you, the reader, so we can focus on covering the issues that matter most to the progressive movement without fear or compromise.
Our work isn’t hidden behind a paywall because of people like you who support our journalism. We want to keep it that way. If you value the work we do and the movements we cover, please consider donating to In These Times.