Election Fray in Honduras
Human rights violations, voter turnout questions stain effort to elect legitimate post-Zelaya president.
Jeremy Kryt
TEGUCIGALPA, HONDURAS – The military-backed de facto government in Honduras named Porfirio “Pepe” Lobo to be the new head of State on Sunday, November 29, after a controversial election that many local and international human rights experts had denounced as both fraudulent and illegal.
The result of the election, in which the government says 49 percent of Honduran voters participated, remains unrecognized by most nations of the world. The United States has recognized it.
Adding to the political turmoil, the U.S.-brokered peace plan designed to heal the social crisis collapsed a few days after the vote, when the Honduran Congress voted on Wednesday against allowing deposed president Mel Zelaya to finish out his term.
But Lobo, the newly-minted president-elect, seems confident he can bring peace to a fractured nation.
“This will be a government of unity and reconciliation,” Lobo said during his victory speech Sunday night, speaking at hotel in the capital of Tegucgalpa. Lobo, who represents the far-right Nationalist party, is a wealthy rancher, with strong ties to the lucrative Honduran timber industry. “These elections have shown the world that democracy exists in Honduras,” Lobo said.
But much of the human rights community remains unconvinced.
“There’s no way you can have free and fair elections when there’s this kind of oppression going on,” said Karen Spring, who was in Honduras to monitor elections for Rights Action, a Connecticut-based nonprofit. “Democracy is a process. But in Honduras there’s been martial law for months… And all that time people were being shot and killed and beaten.”
Another disputed president
The crowd at Lobo’s victory reception Sunday night was small but frenzied. His supporters sang along with a quasi-religious fervor to Lobo’s campaign theme songs, while they waited for the far-right political veteran to appear. Large screens mounted above the crowd showed a steady montage of puppies, men on horseback, and various blue-collar laborers happily going about their work.
Despite his assurances that it was time for “a new Honduras,” Lobo made little mention of specific policy goals or human development initiatives in his speech, preferring instead to focus on patriotic rhetoric.
“We are a free, independent and sovereign country; we won’t accept impositions or divisive political compromises,” he said. Lobo also promised to call a “national dialogue” to address the social and economic problems plaguing the nation. “Nobody will be left out,” he promised.
Honduras was thrown into chaos last June 28, when legally-elected president Mel Zelaya was ousted in a military-backed coup, exiled and replaced by de facto president Roberto Micheletti, a member of Zelaya’s own party. Micheletti has agreed to hand over power to Lobo on January 28, a move many say would complete the coup-legitimization process.
Zelaya – who, ironically, is also a wealthy rancher from the same part of the country as Lobo, and who defeated Lobo in the presidential race in 2005 – had angered political and business elites by attempting to reform a rigidly stratified Honduran society.
In mid-September, he slipped into Honduras, taking refuge in the Brazilian Embassy, where he’s been trapped ever since, surrounded by hundreds of Honduran soldiers and police. In a letter released from the embassy, he asked Hondurans not to recognize the election.
Treaty collapses
Before the elections, the U.S. had been one of the few nations to hint that it might recognize the outcome. But Congress’ failure to reinstate Zelaya calls all that into question.
In an official statement, the U.S. State Department referred to the decision “disappointing.” But members of Honduran Congress seemed firm in their decision. The Congress, which also voted in favor of Zelaya’s ouster in June, voted 111 to 14 in favor of keeping him out of office for the remainder of his term, which ends on January 28.
“Zelaya and his minority of thinkers like to spread lies,” said Nationalist Congressman Carlos Kattan, speaking Wednesday evening at the National Congress Building. “He had no right to put this country in a dangerous situation, and damage its credibility. [T]hey are conspirators against our nation,” Kattan said.
The powerful, pacifist, anti-coup resistance movement, however, contends that the Honduran Congress itself is riddled with corruption.
“They voted against Zelaya because they are representatives of the interests of the oligarchy,” said resistance leader Juan Barahona, in a cell phone interview. “They are the ones who wanted the coup… They see Zelaya as a threat to their interests. A challenge to their economic power, because he sought to make small changes in the system.”
Barahona, who is also a top advisor to president Zelaya, said the resistance would continue whether the president was restored or not. “We will not roll over and surrender,” said Barahona, who’s massive Front Against the Coup continues to mobilize peaceful rallies and marches across the country, despite the ongoing oppression. “We will continue in peace, and we will continue as long as necessary,” Barahona said.
A human rights emergency
“We are in a desperate human rights state of emergency,” said Bertha Oliva, director of the Committee for Disappeared Persons in Honduras (COFADEH). Oliva cited a broad range of confirmed abuses on and about election day, including illegal detentions, beatings, and even “torture and murder.”
In the five months since the putsch, COFADEH has confirmed that authorities have frequently used live rounds against nonviolent demonstrators, and at least 27 members of the resistance have been killed since the coup, including, most recently, a retired teacher and well-known resistance organizer.
According to COFADEH documents, Gradis Espinal, 56, was forced into a marked police patrol car on November 25, in broad daylight in front of several witnesses. The outspoken educator’s body was found the next day, just a few miles to the northeast, in a barrio called Las Casitas on the outskirts of the capital.
Others have been caught in the crossfire with even more devastating results. A 33 year-old dairy worker named Angel Salgado was shot in the head by soldiers after accidentally driving too close to a checkpoint in the capital on November 26. Two other innocent civilians were also struck by 5.56 mm M16 rounds when soldiers opened fire. Salgado lingered for several days on life support, before dying on Wednesday, about the same time Congress was voting against Zelaya.
“They didn’t tell my brother to get out of the car, and they didn’t give him or the other passengers any kind of warning,” said Albert Salgado, the wounded man’s brother. “The soldiers just started shooting at point blank range.” According to the official police report, the round entered just behind Salgado’s left ear, and exited near the top-left side of his skull.
Salgado was married with a four-year-old son.
“The government that has taken over the country is ultimately responsible,” Albert Salgado said of his brother’s death. “Because [the de facto government] has given so much power to the police and the army.”
Voter turnout discrepancies
Because Zelaya and the resistance movement were calling on Honduran citizens to abstain from the elections, there was a great deal of speculation, going into the voting, about what percentage of the 4.6 million Hondurans registered to vote would actually do so. During the last presidential vote, which Zelaya won in 2005, only 55 percent of the electorate participated.
According to Felix Molina, a Honduran political journalist who hosts a popular radio talk show on a station called Radio Global, the rate of abstention in Honduran presidential elections has been rising steadily for the last 27 years, ever since the first elections held under the current Constitution, which was authored by a U.S. backed military dictatorship in 1982.
“Abstention has gone up and up,” he said. “So why would they think that this year – just a few months after a very unpopular military coup – there would be a larger turnout than [the last elections]? I just can’t believe that’s possible.”
The Supreme Electoral Tribune of Honduras reported a 61.3 percent turnout figure on Sunday. Consequently, CNN and Fox News both ran with this figure on election night. But critics accused the EST of deliberately fudging their projection data in the hours after the election, by reporting only the results from wealthy areas around the capital, where voter turnout is traditionally much higher. (This Real News Network video argues that the initial high turnout figure was fabricated by coup leaders to legitimize the election in the eyes of international observers.)
A nongovernmental observation group, Hagamaos Democracia, did a random statistical sampling that showed a much lower nationwide figure: 47.6 percent. On December 4, the government revised its official turnout figure down to 49 percent, Agence France Presse reported.
Other irregularities in the way the EST handled the elections have also raised suspicions. The cell phone-based voter corroboration system “malfunctioned,” causing hours-long delays in tallying the votes. “The putschists wish to legitimize the coup, and so they have a real incentive to manipulate the facts,” said Andres Pavon, president of the Committee for the Defense of Human Rights in Honduras (CODEH), another prominent activist organization. “They have everything to gain if participation tops abstention.”
“It really is a black and white issue,” said Karen Spring, the Rights Action observer. “The real purpose of these elections is to legitimize the coup government.”
Militarized elections
Election day itself was marked by violence against peaceful protesters. Police and soldiers used tear gas and truncheons to break up a peaceful protest march of about 500 people in the country’s largest city, San Pedro Sula, shortly after noon on Sunday.
Witnesses reported that the attack was unprovoked, and that the police suddenly began firing tear gas as the march moved toward the center of town. Nine were detained, and several people had to be hospitalized for their injuries, including a Reuters cameraman.
Police and soldiers were a common sight in the capital on election day.
In the poorer sections of the city, male voters were frisked and in some cases even strip-searched at the entrances. There were no long lines to vote, and most of the journalists and observers reported a decidedly low turnout. By early afternoon the streets of the usually bustling city were deserted.
“It’s not like it should be,” said Karen Andonar, as she was walking to the exit after voting on Sunday. “Usually people are in the streets celebrating on election day. But this year everyone’s afraid.”
But Jerry Weller, a former U.S. Congressman from Illinois who went to Honduras with the Washington Senior Observer Group, said he saw nothing to be worried about in Tegucigalpa.
“I saw free, fair and transparent elections. I saw enthusiasm. People had a very good spirit,” said Weller, who issued a press release endorsing the elections before any preliminary results were in. ” What we witnessed today, at least at the polling stations [was] positive cooperation,” said Weller, who went on to describe the Honduran armed forces as “very professional” during an interview at the election headquarters in the Marriot hotel.
When asked if he could cite any historical examples of “free, fair and transparent” elections taking place under a coup-installed, military dictatorship, former Congressman Weller replied, “This country wants to move forward. The elections are an important part of that process.”
But others remain skeptical of the electoral process under the coup installed government.
“We met with a community group last night, and they’re scared because the police are hanging out at their houses at night, because they’re part of the nonviolent resistance movement,” said Justin Ericson, University of Michigan student who flew to Honduras with the Quixote Center, a Washington D.C.-based NGO. Ericson and the rest of his delegation – about two dozen people from all over the United States – carried signs and marched in front of the U.S. Embassy in Tegucigalpa on Sunday.
According to Karen Spring of Rights Action, that sense of fear extended to the polling places themselves. “How can people vote in peace, when there’s such a huge military presence [at the polling place]? How can you make a good political decision when you know there’s an armed officer watching you?” she said.
Others worry that the election problems run even deeper than intimidation by soldiers.
“This entire electoral process is illegal,” said Nectali Rodesno, a lawyer who was working in an elementary school that had been converted into a polling place for election day.
“The electoral law states that neither police, nor soldiers, can be less than 100 meters distant from the polling places. However, we can see that law is not being obeyed,” Rodesno said, gesturing to a check point just a few meters away where armed troops in camouflage searched voters coming through the gate.
“The putschists know they can break the electoral law, just as they have broken so many others,” the lawyer said, “because the armed forces already govern this country.”
Editor’s note: This article has been updated since it was originally published on InTheseTimes.com Thursday, December 3.
I hope you found this article important. Before you leave, I want to ask you to consider supporting our work with a donation. In These Times needs readers like you to help sustain our mission. We don’t depend on—or want—corporate advertising or deep-pocketed billionaires to fund our journalism. We’re supported by you, the reader, so we can focus on covering the issues that matter most to the progressive movement without fear or compromise.
Our work isn’t hidden behind a paywall because of people like you who support our journalism. We want to keep it that way. If you value the work we do and the movements we cover, please consider donating to In These Times.
