News » May 14, 2010 » Web Only

An Assault on Academic Freedom? (cont’d)

Page 2 of 2« Previous

Due to the recession’s impact on the university’s endowment and a September 2008 flood that forced costly repairs to several campus buildings, North Park had to make cuts. Ho-Youn Kwon, director or the Korean studies center, was also fired in May 2009 as the school’s vision for the “collaboratory” came together.

But Dahlstrom, who met with Parkyn throughout his four years as a North Park student, challenges the idea that financial problems caused Wagner’s firing. “I don’t see how the process of firing someone, finding [a replacement] and then keeping the program [as part of the “collaboratory”] is a good use of resources,” Dahlstrom says. “The ‘financial’ reason just doesn’t make any sense.”

In recent years, other Chicago-area universities have also sparked controversies about intellectual freedom and academics’ political views.

In 2007, political scientist Norman Finkelstein was denied tenure at Chicago’s DePaul University after a very public battle with university officials and Alan Dershowitz, a Harvard law professor and fervent supporter of Israel. Finkelstein, whose parents survived a Nazi death camp, has accused Jews of using the Holocaust as a tool to gain power and money. Although many DePaul faculty members supported Finkelstein and his department recommended him for tenure, he did not receive it, effectively ending his career at DePaul. Finkelstein said the decision was based on “transparently political grounds” and was an “egregious violation” of intellectual freedom.

In 2005, Northwestern University declined to fire Arthur Butz, a Holocaust denier and tenured electrical engineering professor. Butz was criticized for speaking in support of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmajinedad, saying ” I congratulate him on becoming the first head of state to speak out clearly on these issues [the alleged fabrication of the Holocaust], and regret only that it was not a Western head of state.” Former Northwestern President Henry Bienen called Butz “an embarrassment to Northwestern,” but Butz continued to teach at Northwestern despite faculty protests.

Parkyn denies that Wagner’s views on Palestine had anything to do with his termination. “Dr. Wagner wasn’t “fired”–which would imply a decision based on performance review … rather, a year ago we decided to terminate the position which he held … all based on our need to keep the University’s budget balanced and to appropriate available resources as judiciously as possible,” he wrote to In These Times.

Cavello describes Parkyn as “a politician,” and Dahlstrom criticizes the president for his top-down vision of the school and being “completely out of touch with … students.” Dahlstrom worries that consolidating multicultural programs into the “collaboratory” will harm the school by decreasing its diversity. Parkyn maintains that its creation would not affect availability of Middle Eastern studies classes.

On April 29, students organized a forum to discuss the “collaboratory,” which Parkyn and other administrators attended. Students were angry and many spoke out of turn, asking why Wagner had been fired, according to Dahlstrom. (Cavallo says one forum audience member offered to pay Wagner’s salary to avoid a firing; administrators didn’t respond to the proposal.)

Rebecca Ewing, a former student of Wagner’s who helped organize the forum, says he has invaluable connections to Palestine and scholars of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. “He has a lot of Muslim and Jewish friends who he doesn’t reject, and there aren’t many evangelical academics who walk that path, Ewing says. “He’s a lot more liberal regarding interfaith relations. … He asks a lot of questions.”

In the summer of 2009, Cavallo met with Parkyn, who, she says, was angry with her for mobilizing so many students and concerned about upset donors who had contacted him. Cavallo pled her case, saying, “If you shut down Don Wagner, you shut down the Middle East studies program. Then you shut down the center, which is such an asset to North Park.”

Wagner’s 15-year North Park career is now officially over. For many students, alumni and faculty members, a question mark remains.

This article was updated on May 20 to acknowledge the outcome of faculty-administration negotiations.

Sara Peck, a spring 2010 In These Times editorial intern, is a Northwestern University student studying journalism and political science.

More information about Sara Peck

  • Reader Comments

    As a North Park student, and as someone who has engaged with the administration on a related topic (namely, the future of our Global Studies curriculum when we lack a full-time faculty member in Middle Eastern studies), I think the issue at stake could be framed differently.

    I am skeptical that anyone in the present administration wants to suppress Wagner’s views. It’s possible, but unprofessional and lacks evidence. Besides, other professors in our occasionally left-leaning institution hold similar views and their positions are not under threat. (Also, President Parkyn isn’t the only one to “blame,” Provost Jones and Diversity Dean Lindsay were also involved with this decision.)

    To me, it is more probable that Wagner represents such a bizarre niche (Middle Eastern studies in an Evangelical context that do not follow Christian Zionist rhetoric) that while are intellectually honest (and probably true), are not academically mainstream and therefore struggle to attract donors or bring credibility to the university. From the big picture standpoint of the administration, this is a tough pill to swallow, although it should be.

    I commend In These Times and Sara Peck for adding to the pressure students have already been giving our administration as we continue to struggle together towards realizing the unique vision of our university.

    Posted by Kaleb Nyquist on May 14, 2010 at 5:19 PM

    I have heard of Don Wagner. He is a noted expert on the issue of the history of Christian Zionism, an important and fascinating issue which needs further study, especially now. It is a shame that the same reactionary, politically motivated bunch are once again threatening academic freedom. I am a Jew with Israeli citizenship and I’m frankly sick and tired of right wing zionists, whether Christian or Jewish, attacking academic freedom. There is nothing offensive about Wagner’s academic pursuits nor his views.

    Finkelstein, an excellent writer and effective teacher, was denied tenure at De Paul less for his views on Israel than his book entitled, The Holocaust Industry, a title most Jews, and possibly others, found offensive in and of itself. The idea that Jews exploit the Holocaust for revenue and political advantage is offensive and probably untrue. The Holocaust is the real reason Israel exists today. Had this not occured, there would probably be no State of Israel.

    What gave further impetus to the establishment of the Jewish State was what occured after the Holocaust between 1945 and 1948; not only were their continuing pogroms in Poland, taking hundreds of lives, but over a quarter million Jews were left stranded in DP camps in Allied Occupied Europe with no country willing to open their doors to them after the general European displaced persons issue was all but resolved. This obviously drove home the point regarding the need for the Jews to have a state of their own.

    Finkelstein’s contentions are ahistorical, silly and offensive and yet he sees this work as more important than his writings on the Israel/Palestine conflict itself. I believe this is why he was denied tenure. Still, academic freedom should be protected. The case of Arthur Butz, however, is different. Unlike Wagner and Finkelstein, Butz should have been fired. He is motivated purely by hate and not a desire to seek truth. He has made this clear with anti-semitic inuendo and prejudiced statements quite aside from his Holocaust denial. And as the saying goes, You’re entitled to your own opinion but you’re not entitled to your own facts. As far as the historical record has overwhelmingly shown, Butz is more interested than his own set of facts than the actual historical facts. Unfortunately, he still retains his teaching post.

    I just want to conclude by saying that attacks on academic freedom are generally deplorable in a free society and that such continued attacks make it difficult to remove people like Butz who actually should be removed. An thorough examination of the details of each of the three above cases of the academic freedom question clearly proves this contention.

    Posted by cabdriverinchicago on May 16, 2010 at 2:23 PM

    just to be fair, you are still free to say anything as long as its right wing, and socially conservative.

    Posted by 英雄本色 on May 29, 2010 at 5:05 AM
  • Posting Security

    To participate in our forums, please register for a free account