If the circus surrounding the so-called fiscal cliff has taught us anything, it is that politics revolves around the question of how wealth and power should be distributed in our society, i.e. who will be the winners and who will be the losers. Some [RETURN TO ARTICLE]
Get the Latest News & Updates
This form needs Javascript to display, which your browser doesn't support. Sign up here instead
Also by Joel Bleifuss
-
FCC: Fronting For Corporations?
Business is cheering Obama's nominee. That's bad news if you like your media diverse and your Internet free.
MORE » -
Tea Party Coup D’état
Progressives are too quick to believe that the Tea Party hurts Republicans.
MORE » -
A Just War in Timbuktu?
How the Salafist uprising in Mali threw our Enlightenment ideals into confusion.
MORE »
MOST READ
- Farmer Plants First Industrial Hemp Crop in 50 Years
- 40-Day Strike Ends in Victory for Dockworkers
- Battlefield Occupy
- If West, Texas Had Been a Terrorist Attack
- Bring on the Trash
- Party-Crashing for the Climate; Indignados Turn Two; Bus Ads Promote Equal Rights for Palestinians
- We’re Not in Lake Wobegon Anymore
- Publicopoly Exposed
- Not Your Grandma’s Wooden Nickel
- Maggie Thatcher, Milk Snatcher



Reader Comments
Social Security benefits lift about 21.4 million Americans out of poverty. It can be made solvent for nearly 75 years by taking the cap off salary contributions. So when I hear Obama mentioning reducing benefits, he angers me. We need a broad coalition to make sure this doesn’t happen. Millions of Americans are still deep in debt and unemployed. They are hardly able to help dependents on Social Security whose incomes would be cut. The history of adjustments or “bumps” to save the recipients of the least support is that Congressional “adjustments” often lag behind for many years. Surely conservatives could attack Social Security spending at some later time! Simply eliminating the cap on contributions would only affect about 6% of the highest earners covered by Social Security (above $110,000 per year.) See, online “The Evolution of the Social Security Tax Max” and “Distributional Effects of Raising the Social Security Tax Max.”) This would be a tax transfer from very high income recipients in a given year to poor recipients.
Posted by Robert Cogan on Jan 22, 2013 at 8:34 PM