Republicans have been busy sorting through the wreckage of Tuesday’s presidential election returns, and there’s great news. They’ve found a culprit. The problem wasn’t a bad candidate or his badly managed campaign; it wasn’t their rhetoric on immigration policy or their failure to broaden the party’s base beyond people who are elderly, white, religious and Southern; and it wasn’t the Paul Ryan plan to privatize Medicare.
It was an act of God.
As Dick Morris, the Grand Poobah of half-baked punditry, put it: “Sandy, in retrospect, stopped Romney’s post-debate momentum. She was, indeed, the October Surprise. She also stopped the swelling concern over the murders in Benghazi and let Obama get away with his cover-up in which he pretended that a terrorist attack was, in fact, just a spontaneous demonstration gone awry.”
Morris isn’t the only one. Mitt Romney has been citing the storm as a reason his Mitt-mentum stalled, and an anonymous Romney fundraiser is claiming that Sandy, along with the great big (metaphorical) bear hugs that New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gave the president, cost Romney four or five points.
But one wonders why conservatives haven’t yet connected the dots. When Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans in 2005, the cause and effect was clear enough. “Katrina: God’s Judgment on America” was the unsubtle title of one representative essay. The hurricane was apparently “a serious call to repent, to turn away from our wicked ways, from the heart of a loving Father.” The specific object of divine wrath, according to some evangelical Christians, was a gay-pride parade in the city.
The question presents itself: What was God telling us by sending Hurricane Sandy to derail Mitt Romney’s presidential bid? He isn’t ready for a Mormon president yet? He is sore displeased with the GOP in general? That Meatloaf needs to knock it off already?
Sandy’s timing couldn’t be just a coincidence, could it? We’ll await clarification from those in the know.
Please consider supporting our work.
I hope you found this article important. Before you leave, I want to ask you to consider supporting our work with a donation. In These Times needs readers like you to help sustain our mission. We don’t depend on—or want—corporate advertising or deep-pocketed billionaires to fund our journalism. We’re supported by you, the reader, so we can focus on covering the issues that matter most to the progressive movement without fear or compromise.
Our work isn’t hidden behind a paywall because of people like you who support our journalism. We want to keep it that way. If you value the work we do and the movements we cover, please consider donating to In These Times.
Theo Anderson is an In These Times contributing writer. He has a Ph.D. in modern U.S. history from Yale and writes on the intellectual and religious history of conservatism and progressivism in the United States. Follow him on Twitter @Theoanderson7.
