There is no requirement to contribute to any political campaign. This has nothing to do with democracy. Americans reading In These Times are highly likely to be voters, and voting requires no monetary consideration.
Member Profile
monkyhead
Latest Comments view all 7
-
-
The Onion's finest moment: God Angrily Clarifies 'Don't Kill' Rule http://www.theonion.com/content/node/28151
Posted to Reading The Onion Seriously
-
I would hardly call Clinton's defeat "resounding," and the assertion that Obama "faced at least as much racism" as Clinton faced sexism is preposterous. Racism has become, almost in a good way (almost!), something in the public sphere that is discussed much more than actually engaged in (which is not to suggest that racism is not rampant, merely that public admission of racism has become somewhat taboo). Sexism on the other hand, is so casual as to be practically unnoticed. Consider, for example, this from the Huffington Post: "Michelle Obama Vs. Cindy McCain: A Study In Styles "Every first lady needs …
Posted to An Anti-Clinton For VP
-
oh i see what you did there. You watched a movie thinking it was supposed to be investigative journalism or something. Why don't you try a newspaper instead?
Posted to Errol Morris' Myopia
-
I appreciate your points about defense budgets, and campaign financing, and single payer, etc., and in response I'd just add the url for the True Majority "Oreos" animation. http://www.truemajority.org/oreos/ But the swipe at Krugman just isn't right. It's true he's critical of Obama, but he's hardly the "president of the Hillary Clinton fan club." That's just childish, Mr. Bleifuss.
Posted to Political Climate Change
- Joined October 13, 2006
- Last Visit November 19, 2008
- Location California, USA
IN THESE TIMES COMMUNITY MEMBERS
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
RSS Feed