To the person who posted about how Foley's actions weren't as bad as Gerry Studds, there are a couple of VERY important differences that are getting lost in the media frenzy: 1. The sexual relationship between Studds and the page was consensual. Not that Studds should've had an affair with someone who worked for him, but it *was* consensual. In the recent case, the pages clearly didn't welcome Foley's attention. 2. The young man who worked for Studds was actually old enough to *give* legal consent. In Foley's case, the pages were underage. I'm not saying Studds showed good judgment, but …
- Joined October 17, 2006
- Last Visit October 17, 2006
IN THESE TIMES COMMUNITY MEMBERS
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
Turning a Wall Street Giveaway Into a Rescue for All Americans
- 9.
- 10.
RSS Feed