Election 2000 Coverage

Never Mind the Bollocks
BY BILL BOISVERT

Here's the new Republican Party
September 4 , 2000


The Battle of Philadelphia
BY DAVE LINDORFF

September 4 , 2000


Working It
BY DAVID MOBERG
Will unions go all out for Gore?

September 4 , 2000


Editorial
BY DAVID MOBERG
Big money problems.
September 4 , 2000


Cleaning Up
BY HANS JOHNSON
Missouri, Oregon consider campaign finance initiatives

September 4 , 2000


Why I'm Voting for Nader ...
BY ROBERT McCHESNEY
August 21, 2000


... And Why I'm Not
BY JAMES WEINSTEIN
August 21, 2000


Dumped
BY JEFFREY ST. CLAIR
August 7, 2000
Bush's dirty politics turn an Texas town into a sewer.


An Environmental President
BY GUY SAPERSTEIN
August 7, 2000


Three's Company
BY JOHN NICHOLS
July 10, 2000
Third parties strategize for the November elections.


Editorial
BY JOEL BLEIFUSS
June 12, 2000
Memo to third parties: Face Reality.


Marching On
BY DAVE LINDORFF
June 12, 2000
Unity 2000 plans to disrupt this summer's GOP convention


Party Palace
BY NATHANIEL HELLER
May 1, 2000
George W. Bush's lucrative sleepovers


Stupid Tuesday
BY HANS JOHNSON
April 17, 2000
After Super Tuesday, progressives mull over missed opportunities


What Women Want
BY DAVID MOBERG
April 17, 2000
Working women's votes could seal Al Gore's fate. But is he listening to them?


Ralph Really Runs
BY KARI LYDERSEN
April 17, 2000
Socialist presidential candidate David McReynolds


How to Deal with Gore
BY JEFFREY ST. CLAIR and LOIS GIBBS
April 17, 2000
Love him or leave him?


Ralph Really Runs
BY DOUG IRELAND
April 3, 2000
Nader kicks off his second bid for president


Editorial
March 20, 2000
Flub watch.


On the Fence
BY MATTHEW KNOESTER
March 20, 2000
Human rights or big oil for Al Gore?


The First Stone
BY JOEL BLEIFUSS
March 6, 2000
Vanishing voters.


Gush vs. Bore
BY DOUG IRELAND
March 6, 2000


Free Ride
BY PAT MURPHY
March 6, 2000
Meet the real John McCain.


Cash and Carry
BY JEFFREY ST. CLAIR
March 6, 2000
George W. Bush's environmental menace.


Fair Weather Friends
BY JUAN GONZALEZ
March 6, 2000
Candidates court the Latino vote.


More Marketplace Medicine
BY DAVID MOBERG
March 6, 2000
Neither Democrats' health plan will fix the system.


New Labor, Old Politics
BY DAVID MOBERG
November 14, 1999


Bradley Courts the Black Vote
BY SALIM MUWAKKIL
October 31, 1999


Changing Primary Colors
BY DAVID DYSSEGAARD KALLICK
June 13, 1999


The Great Right Hope
BY RUSSELL CONTRERAS
Who is George W. Bush?
May 30, 1999


Money Money Money!
BY NEIL SWANSON
Al Gore and Bill Bradley go one-on-one.
May 30, 1999

 

Fair-Weather Friends

Candidates court the Latino vote

By Juan Gonzalez

Back in 1996, Republican Party national leaders sought to outdo each other with draconian federal and state laws that targeted the country's immigrant population, accompanied with television campaign ads that portrayed our borders being overrun by undocumented and crime-prone Latinos. In his run for president, party standard-bearer Bob Dole supported cutbacks in federal benefits to even legal immigrants, and he urged making English the nation's official language.

What a difference four years make.

Few candidates have touched on the
issues most important to Latinos.
Credit: Bryan Snyder/Newsmakers

This time around, we've heard none of the same immigrant bashing from White House hopefuls on the Republican side. It seems party leaders have learned a lesson from the enormous backlash by Latino voters in the past few years, when millions who had remained permanent residents for years opted to become citizens to protect themselves from Republican-engineered cut-offs in federal and state benefits. Those new citizens immediately registered as Democrats and voted to unseat anyone who had targeted them.

Bill Clinton garnered only 61 percent of the Latino vote in 1992, but that figure rose to 72 percent in 1996, a clear indication that most Hispanics regarded the Republicans as anti-Latino. It hasn't always been that way. Back in 1980, Ronald Reagan got 40 percent of the Latino vote nationwide. But lately even in Florida, where the Cuban immigrant community has always been faithfully Republican, the Democrats have made big headway: Clinton grabbed 44 percent of the Florida Cuban vote in 1996, compared to Dole's 46 percent.

Part of George W. Bush's appeal to Republican Party operatives is the possibility that he will be able to siphon off from the Democrats that big share of Latino voters Reagan once enjoyed. "These guys do an about-face and now they're all trying to campaign in Spanish," says Juan Andrade, president of the Chicago-based United States Hispanic Leadership Institute.

But we are not talking only percentages here. Substantial numbers are at stake. Even as most Americans are increasingly being turned off by electoral politics, Latinos are being turned on. Between 1992 and 1996, the number of votes cast decreased by more than 9 million among non-Hispanic whites and decreased by 15,000 among blacks. But votes increased by a whopping 690,000 among Latinos.

Today's "enlightened" Republicans--represented by Bush, New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani and Los Angeles Mayor Richard Riordan--are working overtime to be seen as pro-immigrant. The presidential candidates have to work fast because the front-loaded primary schedule means that the big states where most Latinos reside are voting early. On March 7, California, New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Maryland and Ohio will be among 11 states holding primaries. Each of these states has a huge Latino electorate. California's, of course, is the biggest prize, and New York is not far behind. But Massachusetts and Connecticut have sizeable Latino populations in each of their major cities. Those primaries will be followed the next week by votes in Texas and Florida. Most Latinos in the country will have had a chance to express their presidential preferences by March 14.

Yet other than producing commercials in Spanish, few of the candidates have touched on the issues most important to Latinos. Gore has come closest with his repeated calls for raising the minimum wage--something that disproportionately affects immigrant workers--and with his emphasis on greater spending for education.

But we have heard nothing in presidential debates so far about the devastating economic crisis in Latin America that is fueling more immigration to this country, the massive uproar in Puerto Rico over the Navy's bombing practice in Vieques, police abuse and killings and racial profiling in black and Latino inner-city neighborhoods, the rise of the digital divide in an increasingly technology-driven economy, the growth of sweatshop labor, or the rampant exploitation of immigrant labor in much of white suburban America. Nor have we heard any of the candidates tackle a question that, thanks to the national uproar over the fate of 6-year-old Elian Gonzalez, has once again been thrust into the spotlight: When will our country end this irrational blockade of Cuba that has been condemned by virtually every nation in the world?

Maybe some hardy reporters will force the candidates to respond to a few of these questions during the next few weeks, but don't bet on it. National political reporters, even those on the left, are overwhelmingly white and generally more ignorant about the nation's 30 million Latinos than the candidates.

Juan Gonzalez is a contributing editor of In These Times.

 

 


In These Times © 2000
Vol. 24, No. 7