Global warming continues to impact the landscape of the entire world while remaining sidelined by most mainstream media. According to many in the alternative press, this year’s United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20) was a failure, in which participants continued to sell out indigenous populations and the poor to corporate interests. Despite being isolated from policy discussions and decision-making, indigenous people and their allies continue to challenge these policies with counter-conferences and grassroots organizing.
“Rio Earth Summit: Tragedy, Farce, and Distraction—Green Economy and Trade Liberalization Lead to Global Foreclosure”
by Anne Petermann (Z Magazine, September 2012, v.25, no. 9, p. 24-27)
Anne Petermann presents a scathing summary of Rio+20. The conference’s emphasis on a “green economy,” she says, is just a drive to further privatize and commodify nature, liberalize trade and seek profit at the expense of the environment. Peterman writes:
At the Rio+20 summit, industrialized countries and multinational corporations, accompanied by institutions like the IMF and World Bank, led the push for development of the green economy—that is, to use the very ecological devastation caused by global capitalism to create markets in so-called “environmental services” by turning them into tradable commodities. These new markets would help prop up the global economy in a greenwashed version of business as usual.
“Tomorrow is Too Late”
by Fidel Castro (Green Left Weekly, May 30, 2012, no. 924, p. 14)
The Green Left Weekly notes that this reprint of Fidel Castro’s 1992 speech to the first United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development is “more relevant than ever” as we pass the largely ineffectual Rio+20 conference. As Castro said:
If we want to save humanity from this self-destruction, wealth and available technologies must be distributed better throughout the planet. Less luxury and less waste in a few countries would mean less poverty and hunger in much of the world.
Please consider supporting our work.
I hope you found this article important. Before you leave, I want to ask you to consider supporting our work with a donation. In These Times needs readers like you to help sustain our mission. We don’t depend on—or want—corporate advertising or deep-pocketed billionaires to fund our journalism. We’re supported by you, the reader, so we can focus on covering the issues that matter most to the progressive movement without fear or compromise.
Our work isn’t hidden behind a paywall because of people like you who support our journalism. We want to keep it that way. If you value the work we do and the movements we cover, please consider donating to In These Times.
