Small donations have HUGE consequences. Senior Editor Laura Washington explains why.
ZoomZoom InZoom OutPrintDiscuss
Views > June 15, 2006

Overthrow, Over and Over

By Laura S. Washington

Hawaii was the first domino to fall. There have been 13 more and we're still counting: Guatemala, Iran, Chile, Honduras, Grenada, Panama, Iraq ...

The old saw goes, “the trend is your friend.” 

Let’s try that one again.

Stephen Kinzer’s new book, Overthrow: America’s Century of Regime Change from Hawaii to Iraq (Times Books) puts the kibosh on that notion. Kinzer, a former New York Times foreign correspondent, deconstructs America’s disturbingly counterproductive foreign policy through competing critiques of the country’s imperialism and its incompetence. His chronicle of America’s role in interventions into 14 sovereign nations posits failure and avarice as our lasting progeny.

It is a history lesson we can’t afford to forget. 

Surfers, slackers, grass skirts and sunsets—that’s what Hawaii is all about, right? Think again. Think regime change. The 1893 overthrow of Hawaii’s monarch, Queen Liluokalani, launched 110 years of American-led regime changes around the globe. Hawaii’s monarch was overthrown by a group of haole (the Hawaiian term for white Americans). These wealthy sugar planters teamed up with John L. Stevens, the American ambassador to Hawaii. 

The “convenient” presence of the American gunboat Boston and 200 marines in Honolulu Harbor allowed the haole to lay Queen Liluokalani low. Minister Stevens, in classic American diplomatese, offered a “request” to Boston Captain Gilbert Wiltse: “In view of the existing critical circumstances in Honolulu, indicating an inadequate legal force, I request you to land marines and sailors from the ship under your command for the protection of the United States legation and the United States Consulate and to secure the safety of American life and property.”

Hawaii was the first domino to fall. There have been 13 more, and we’re still counting: Cuba, Nicaragua, Puerto Rico, the Philippines, Guatemala, Honduras, Vietnam, Chile, Iran, Grenada, Panama, Afghanistan and Iraq. The circumstances are familiar, the parallels eerie.

Kinzer writes that both George W. Bush, who invaded Afghanistan and Iraq, and President William McKinley, who intervened in the Philippines, “were motivated by a deep belief that the Unites States has a sacred mission to spread its form of government to faraway countries. Neither doubted that the people who lived in these countries would welcome America as liberators.” 

Talk to Rummy about it.

In a recent interview, Kinzer noted that Bush’s predilection for a “faith-based” approach has nothing to do with The Lord. Instead, Bush relies on a myopic “faith-based foreign policy based on what ‘we’ believe to be true, not what the facts argue.”

His book also mentions that “four CIA station chiefs in Tehran, Guatemala City, Saigon and Santiago explicitly warned against staging coups” in their respective nations.  

What’s the point of spending billions for intelligence if the top dogs in the administration doggedly ignore it, or worse, send it back for rewrite? The CIA is surely misnamed: It’s really the Compromised Intelligence Agency.

The level of incompetence and venality is mind-boggling. Coups, insurrections, revolts and assassinations—our government has done it all. This trend is indeed not our friend. In fact, as Kinzer notes, America’s century of regime change demonstrates that the United States is singularly unsuited to ruling foreign lands.

Americans lack a fundamental understanding of the string of failures that our country has used to feather our own nest. It’s what Studs Terkel, America’s historian, calls our “National Alzheimer’s Disease.” We have no memory of history or its abiding lessons. What can we learn? What policy can we expect when contestants on American Idol capture more votes than any American presidential candidate in history? We have wrestled with this conundrum for more than a century. We have repeatedly been pinned to the mat.

Our dubious and flawed foreign policy is evident to everyone in the world but us. It’s a FUBU foreign policy: For Us, By Us. Americans are anesthetized by rampant consumerism and ideological nonsense jacked up with a healthy dollop of jingoism.

As a result, the checks and balances provided by an educated electorate have all but disappeared from American governance. The fact that public opinion cannot counter America’s affection for regime change is a fatal flaw.

After Vietnam, our shell-shocked policymakers and military apparatchiks keenly felt the sting of the grassroots protests movements. The protests mitigated the government’s aggression. No one wanted “another Vietnam.” The cost was too high. But shelving the draft, moving toward Rumsfeld’s smaller, deadlier military and fighting a global terrorist threat have ushered in a scary new world.

Here’s hoping Kinzer’s book can reach an ahistorical America and alert us to the perils of our interventionist ways.

Laura S. Washington, an In These Times senior editor, teaches journalism at DePaul University and is a columnist for the Chicago Sun-Times.

More information about Laura S. Washington
  • subscribe to print magazine

  • Reader Comments

    As valuable and timely as these insights are, Mr. Kinzer’s views do not address what is happening both (I) inside our own country and (II) outside of the context of physical borders of sovereign nations.

    (I) Our “leaders” are turning this country into a fascist state.  In the fascist view, the state is the end and the individual is the means.  This is the exact opposite of the democratic philosophy.  For e.g., see:
    http://www.oldamericancentury.org/14pts.htm and http://www.oldamericancentury.org/14_pts_2.htm

    How are they getting away with this?  One example:
    There are 4 elements in making decisions, whether it’s which shirt to wear to a party, or whether to ask sons and daughters to risk their lives to fight a war:
    1.  Frame, or structure the question
    2.  Gather intelligence
    3.  Come to conclusions
    4.  Learn from feedback
    If you improperly frame the question, you can set out (or, alternatively, set others out ...) to solve the wrong problem by creating a mental framework that causes you (or others) to overlook the best options, to gather the wrong intelligence, and to come to the wrong conclusions.  Here is a must-see for understanding how those speaking at the 2004 RNC (ab-)used framing to drive their agenda:
    http://www.oldamericancentury.org/gopconstrm.mov

    Here is a good breakdown on why the war in Iraq, and arguably in Afghanistan, was an act of aggression, and not a “just” war:
    Go to this site:  http://www.platofootnote.org/, click on “lectures”, and click on “just war”.  What he doesn’t say is that if the war is not a “just” war, then it is an act of aggression--a war crime--and our “leaders” are war criminals.

    In the words of TJ Templeton, we have “...a small cadre of corporate elite have formed a fascist organization which has usurped the United States government through a questionable election and sympathetic court, installed their members in the top levels of the executive, diplomatic, and military offices, and have hijacked the nation’s policy to fit their fascist agenda.”

    Now, on to (II), what is happening outside of the context of physical borders of sovereign nations…

    Noam Chomsky once said that “The free flow of capital creates what some international economists call a virtual senate, meaning financial capital can impose the social policies that it chooses on governments, and it can punish those that it chooses by capital flight that naturally restricts democracy and undermines the possibility that people can participate in socio-economic planning.” In other words, corporations have made governments their puppets and have created institutions like the World Trade Organization ("WTO") for their own protection.  I’ve borrowed some quotes and concepts from Shiva’s “Stolen Harvest”, below:

    A WTO agreement criminalizes seed-saving and seed-sharing.  Think about this.  70% of the world’s people earn their livelihoods by producing food, and now they are forced to buy new seed every year from corporations, in spite of centuries of labor spent developing seeds for particular regions, climates and conditions.  In addition, through the WTO, corporations can usurp the knowledge of the seed and monopolize it by claiming it as their private property.  RiceTec of the US is claiming patents on Basmati rice.  Soybean, which evolved in East Asia, and mustard, of Indian origin, have been patented by Calgene.  Ten corporations control 32% of the commercial-seed market, and 100% of the market for genetically engineered seeds, as well as the global agrochemical and pesticide markets.  Just 5 corporations control the global trade in grain. The WTO and their corporations are driving out polycultures with industrial monocultures. This is a recipe for starving people while making money on selling pesticides, patented seeds, and herbicides.

    In just about every place we look, we see the sacrifice of the future for the present.  And it’s not limited to conflicts between soveriegn entities.

    Posted by nyvegan on Jun 17, 2006 at 9:08 AM

    NYVEGAN,
    Good post on the WTO , have you tried links ? 
    No 1<
    No 2

    No 3

    Americans lack a fundamental understanding of the string of failures that our country has used to feather our own nest. It’s what Studs Terkel, America’s historian, calls our “National Alzheimer’s Disease.” We have no memory of history or its abiding lessons. What can we learn? What policy can we expect when contestants on American Idol capture more votes than any American presidential candidate in history? We have wrestled with this conundrum for more than a century. We have repeatedly been pinned to the mat.

    Our dubious and flawed foreign policy is evident to everyone in the world but us. It’s a FUBU foreign policy: For Us, By Us. Americans are anesthetized by rampant consumerism and ideological nonsense jacked up with a healthy dollop of jingoism.

    As a result, the checks and balances provided by an educated electorate have all but disappeared from American governance. The fact that public opinion cannot counter America’s affection for regime change is a fatal flaw.

    On avarice we have no doubt.

    Failure is still being disputed as history unfolds, but I haven’t read the book, so definitions of failure to be discussed.

    I’m afraid vegan is correct on Ricetec, Calgene, the WTO , and my response is to wish them all dead.

    Posted by frog on Jun 24, 2006 at 4:04 PM
  • register a new account »Posting Security

    To participate in our forums, please register for a free account.
Join Here
Member Login

Forgot password?

Article Appeared in this Issue

Full contents
Past issues


Donate now
and get a
free, signed copy
of Rick Perlstein's new book Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America!

Popular Discussions