Working In These Times

Friday, Jun 17, 2016, 11:54 am  ·  By Joe Burns

What the Labor Movement Can Learn from Bernie Sanders’ Unapologetic Socialism

Bernie Sanders speaks to National Nurses United members in 2011. (National Nurses United / Flickr)  

This post originally appeared at Jacobin.

The Bernie Sanders campaign has injected socialism into the mainstream discourse for the first time in decades. Young Sanderistas have rallied behind social-democratic demands that fly in the face of forty years of neoliberal policy, and polls show that millennials are surprisingly receptive to socialist ideas.

The positive response to Sanders’s avowed democratic socialism—and to his call for a political revolution—opens the door for a discussion all but absent from today’s labor movement: the importance of socialist ideas to a successful trade union movement.

For most of the labor movement’s history, a broad socialist-minded wing fused its vision of society with a practical program for labor’s future. Whether it was the industrial unionism of the early 1900s, the CIO unions of the 1930s, or the rank-and-file anti-concession movement of the 1970s and 1980s, labor’s left offered an alternative to union decline and stagnation.

Today, however, labor unions rarely discuss class issues. Disputes are particularized, transformed into individual battles between an employer and its workers rather than a larger struggle between opposing classes.


Friday, Jun 17, 2016, 11:36 am  ·  By Jeff Schuhrke

Chicago Workers Are Close to Winning a New Paid Sick Leave Law

Activists from Arise Chicago celebrate the committee approval of a paid sick leave ordinance. The ordinance will go to a full council vote next Wednesday.   (Arise Chicago)

“I’ve been working maybe 15 years, and I’ve never had a paid sick day,” says Chicago delivery driver Abraham Cabrera. When he has to miss work to take his asthmatic son to the emergency room, he says he doesn’t get paid and fears that he could get fired.


Wednesday, Jun 15, 2016, 6:35 pm  ·  By Shaun Richman

The Right to Strike Must Mean the Right to Return to Work After a Strike

Verizon workers in Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania, during their strike earlier this year. (Paul Weaver / Flickr)  

With the decisive victory for union members at Verizon, 2016 is already on pace to be the second year in a row where recorded strike activity has increased over the previous half-decade. Now, a new decision from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) could restore legal job protections for striking workers, making workplace job actions a more common—and more powerful—union strategy.

Workers simply do not have a meaningful right to strike if they do not have a right to return to the job when the strike is over. But, thanks to the judicial gutting of labor rights, going on strike is a high stakes proposition for American workers. Not only do striking workers lose out on pay and benefits during the strike, but they run the risk of losing their jobs entirely. So, while work stoppages are on the rise relative to the last few years, they are at historically low levels compared to the post-war era when wages actually rose with corporate profits.

In a new case, American Baptist Homes, the NLRB attempts to strike a balance between workers’ statutory right to strike and protection against employer retaliation for union activity and a boss’s Supreme Court-granted “right” to hire permanent replacement workers “to protect and continue his business.” Thankfully in this case, the exceptionally arrogant and stupid Executive Director of the employer in this case and her counsel went on the record that their use of permanent replacements was meant to “punish the strikers and the Union” and to discourage future strikes, as Benjamin Sachs has detailed.

For much of the last four decades, the NLRB has simply taken a boss’s word that the permanent replacement of striking workers was necessary to continue her business. Now, the NLRB has declared that it will return to an earlier, Supreme Court-approved standard in which employers’ rights to permanently replace striking workers may be “wholly impeached by the showing of an intent to encroach upon protected rights.”

In other words, the NLRB will investigate when an employer hires scabs—and they better have a good case. Since most strikes these days are defensive—pushing back against employers’ attempts to gut work rules, slash pay and benefits and bust the union—this is a big deal.


Tuesday, Jun 14, 2016, 4:33 pm  ·  By Samantha Winslow

Teachers Unions Are Pushing Back Against Draconian Student Discipline Policies

San Francisco teachers rallied at their school board for Safe, Stable, and Supportive Schools. Photo: United Educators of San Francisco  

This post first appeared at Labor Notes.

Two kindergarteners are poking each other with their pencils. What starts as a game soon gets out of hand. With one child bleeding, the teacher brings them to the principal’s office. Later, she finds out both kids were suspended and sent home.

It’s not an uncommon scenario in today’s public schools. But as activists draw attention to high rates of suspensions, racial disparities, and the “school-to-prison pipeline,” the political winds are shifting. Policymakers at the federal and district levels have begun to demand fewer suspensions, especially for minor rule-breaking.

It’s an issue where not all teachers see eye to eye. But a growing number of teachers and unions are rising to the challenge, pushing their school districts to back up suspension bans with the resources to make alternatives really work.


Tuesday, Jun 14, 2016, 1:57 pm  ·  By Bruce Vail

Rolling Strike By Teamsters at US Foods Aims to Protect Union Jobs

Teamsters from Local 355 protest job cuts from grocery distributor US Foods, Inc.   (Teamsters 355)

A rolling strike is hitting multiple warehouses operated by the nation-wide grocery distributor US Foods, Inc. as the Teamsters union tries to fight off threats to its jobs by death from a thousand corporate cuts.

The latest in a six-week series of strikes hit a US Foods distribution center in Plymouth, Minnesota, June 8, when truck drivers, warehouse, yard and maintenance workers, and office staff from Teamsters Local 120 honored a picket line manned by Teamsters from Maryland. The job actions have been hitting widely scattered US Foods sites across the country since US Foods triggered a strike in the Baltimore suburb of Severn, Maryland, with a scheme the union says is designed to to fire union workers and shift their jobs to non-union sites.


Monday, Jun 13, 2016, 8:37 pm  ·  By Stephen Franklin

The War on Workers’ Comp

(tattoodj / Flickr)  

For nearly a century, millions of workers have endured punishing jobs in construction, mining and factory work—jobs with high levels of work-related disability and injury. As a tradeoff for the dangers, they’ve had the assurance of workers’ compensation if injured permanently on the job. Employers accepted this deal, albeit sometimes grudgingly, because it  removed the possibility of being sued over work-related injuries. 

But as labor has weakened and Republicans have won control of more and more statehouses, states have slowly chipped away at workers’ compensation benefits.

Since just 2003, more than 30 states have passed laws that have “reduced benefits for injured workers, created hurdles for medical care or made it more difficult for workers to qualify,” according to a recent investigative series by ProPublica and NPR. Some of the harshest cuts came in California, Arizona, Florida, Oklahoma, North Dakota, Kansas, Indiana and Tennessee. Today, according to the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), many injured and disabled workers “never enter the workers’ compensation system.” OSHA also estimates that workers’ compensation covers only about 21 percent of the lost wages and medical bills encountered by injured workers and their families.

Illinois, long a union stronghold, could nevertheless join the pack of those closing the doors for some to workers’ compensation if right-wing millionaire Gov. Bruce Rauner gets his way.


Monday, Jun 13, 2016, 5:08 pm  ·  By Barry Eidlin

In the UAW, Rising Academic Worker Unionism Is Haunted By the Ghost of Walter Reuther

George Meany (left) and Walter Reuther (right) in 1955.   (University of Maryland Digital Collections)

First published at Jacobin.

Things are looking up for student worker unionism. For decades, the legions of graduate and undergraduate teaching and research assistants whose labor is critical to the daily functioning of universities have fought to establish a basic claim: the work they do is, in fact, work—it’s not just part of their education.


Monday, Jun 13, 2016, 2:53 pm  ·  By Nadia Prupis

‘Huge Win’ for Workers as DC Council Approves $15 Minimum Wage

After Fight for $15 organizers, shown protesting in New York, campaigned in D.C. for over a year, Mayor Muriel Bowser called for raising the wage.   The All-Nite Images / Flickr / Creative Commons

This article first appeared at Common Dreams.

Heralding a new victory for the Fight for $15 movement, lawmakers in Washington, D.C. on Tuesday unanimously approved a measure to raise the city's minimum wage to $15 an hour by 2020, which Mayor Muriel Bowser has promised to sign.


Thursday, Jun 9, 2016, 8:49 pm  ·  By Bill Fletcher, Jr.

What Activists Committed to the Long-Haul Fight Can Learn from the Life of Organizer Fred Ross

A young Fred Ross, right, with Woody Guthrie at the Arvin farm labor camp near Bakersfield, California, in 1939.  

The biographies of icons frequently fall into one of two categories. On the one hand they may be laudatory, in some cases turning the subject into a saint. At the opposite end, they can tend towards tell-all pieces, in some cases aiming to tear down the subject. What makes America’s Social Arsonist: Fred Ross and Grassroots Organizing in the Twentieth Century, Gabriel Thompson’s new biography of the legendary community organizer, unusual is that it presents a very balanced account of the life and work of one of the foremost progressive organizers of the 20th century, while at the same time offering very useful insights into the art and craft of progressive organizing.


Wednesday, Jun 8, 2016, 6:49 pm  ·  By Robert Schwartz

New Labor Board Ruling Restricts Bosses’ Ability To Hire Permanent Replacements for Striking Workers

Protestors outside the NLRB's Washington, D.C. headquarters in November 2007.   Tim1965/Wikimedia Commons

This aricle originally appeared at Labor Notes.

A game-changing interpretation from the Obama-appointed National Labor Relations Board has narrowed the allowable reasons why an employer may hire permanent replacements during a strike.