Michael Moore Takes on Capitalism Itself
September 15
1:39 pm
PITTSBURGH—After leading a march for single-payer health insurance from the AFL-CIO convention in Pittsburgh to a movie theater, documentary filmmaker Michael Moore gave the official U.S. premiere of his new film to an audience of unionists and progressive activists Tuesday night, one day before its Hollywood premiere.
Capitalism: A Love Story tackles the financial crisis in Moore’s established style of guerrilla filmmaking, attempting to confront Wall Street titans and sympathetically portray its victims.
“I called this film ‘Capitalism: A Love Story’ because they love their money,” he explained, referring to Wall Street. “But this film has a twist: They also love our money.”
Moore’s new film ranks with his best work, but he tackles a more abstract, or at least complex, topic–capitalism. He sees the film as the culmination of 20 years of work, starting with his breakthrough account of the decline of Flint, Michigan, in Roger and Me.
Starting with bank videos of bank robbers—one shown kissing his money— Moore uses old educational and other film clips to link the fall of Rome and contemporary America, then explores home foreclosures and a self-proclaimed “vulture” investor in foreclosures.
He asks, What is capitalism?, and examines how a system that enriches an elite and preys on the weak can survive in a democracy. It worked in the years after World War II as unions and government made the economy more egalitarian, Moore argues, but Reagan began a corporate takeover of government that led to a casino economy and eventual collapse.
Moore recounts the tale with personal stories and interviews. A top Wall Street trader who can’t explain derivatives. Priests explaining why capitalism is “radically evil.” Families of deceased workers whose employers had taken out “dead peasant” insurance policies on their employees to profit from their death.
He also tells the stories of those who fought back, from Republic Windows sit-in factory occupiers to a community group helping to return foreclosed families to their homes.
In lost film footage Moore’s team found, Franklin Roosevelt outlines his Second Bill of Rights, such as a right to a living wage job, healthcare and education. Workers at an employee-owned factory demonstrate how democracy can work on the job. Indeed, that’s Moore’s alternative to capitalism–democracy.
That’s a love story for those left out of the “plutonomy,” as Wall Street labels the new American economy Moore so devastatingly portrays.
Posted by David Moberg · + share/save
Please Login to Comment register a new account »
About this Blog
"Working In These Times" is dedicated to providing independent and incisive coverage of the labor movement and the struggles of workers to obtain safe, healthy and just workplaces. more
Recent Posts 
- Senators Move To Shred Public Option, Fool Progressives While Unions Fight Back December 7
- Old Criminal Records Are Life Sentences in Job Market December 7
- Forging International Labor Solidarity in Wartime No Easy Task December 6
- Labor Praises Jobs Summit, Calls For Action—But Obama Sending Mixed Signals on Major Spending December 4
- Unemployment Toll: $1 Trillion in Lost Wages December 4
WORKING E-NEWSLETTER:
Receive our weekly blog round-up
Contributors
Blogroll
- Work in Progress (FDL)
- Labor Is Not a Commodity
- United Steelworkers Blog
- Jobs With Justice
- Association for Union Democracy
- National Labor Relations Board
- Open Left
- AFSCME Blog
- Talking Points Memo
- Democracy Now!
- Union Review
- Economic Policy Institute
- Robert Reich
- Left Turn
- Today’s Workplace
- Alternet: Workplace
- AFL-CIO Now Blog
- Change to Win Connect
- Monthly Review
- Talking Union
- Christopher Hayes’ Capitolism
- Labour Start
- Labor Notes
- Working Life
- Dollars and Sense
- American Prospect

Comments
Dear David:
“Plutonomy” is the perfect term for the new economy, where family-wage jobs, our productive capacity, and entire communities are being laid waste so a few can benefit from diverting capital to the casino economy.
When di the Wall Street Journal first use this? I thought that they had become considerable less forthright in recent years about the workings of the economy, but occasionally, they must let the truth slip through.