Help In These Times raise $10,000 in three weeks! Donate now!

NYC Garment Workers: A Rags to Riches to Rags Story

Friday
October 16
3:31 pm

Image courtesy of HBO Documentary Films.

By David Moberg

At one point the garment industry was the largest employer in New York City, providing jobs for tens of thousands of mainly immigrant workers and entrepreneurial opportunities for many others. Now it has almost vanished.

Schmatta: Rags to Riches to Rags, a new documentary film by Marc Levin to be shown on HBO Monday evening, Oct. 19, tells the story of the city's rag trade from both sides: the hard-driving, cigar-chomping small businessmen and the hard-working, predominately female workforce. ("Schmatta" is Yiddish for rag; trailer available below.)

Through a mixture of empathetic interviews and fascinating archival photos and film, Schmatta makes clear how important the unions were in transforming workers’ lives and in maintaining uniform standards in a dynamic, highly competitive business.

It vividly re-creates the world of workers at the Triangle Shirtwaist factory, where a 1911 fire in a high-rise workshop with locked exits led to the death of over 100 mainly young women workers.

The fire provoked a strong public revulsion and spurred union organizing that not only improved wages and working conditions, but also came to wield progressive political power, channeled through leaders like Sidney Hillman–FDR advised aides to “check it with Sidney”–and David Dubinsky, shown putting pressure on a senator during a telephone call.

The film shows how the predominately Jewish and Italian (then Latino) workers, with the help of strong unions, transformed an industry of dangerous, squalid sweatshops into a source of solid jobs and social mobility. As Workers United/SEIU president Bruce Raynor says, the “lifting of those workers from poverty to the middle class revolutionized America.”

Then the industry, which had prospered marketing to a growing middle-income market, was itself revolutionized. Import barriers were lowered, and steadily manufacturers shifted work overseas. In 1985, 70 percent of garments sold in the U.S. were made here; 50 percent in 1995; 5 percent today.                       

Control of the industry shifted from small manufacturers immersed in a local network to celebrity designers and even more to an increasingly consolidated group of mass merchandisers, who were dominated by profit-maximizing bean counters, not people with a feel for the industry, its crafts, and its social relations.

The old businessmen were colorful guys who knew their fabrics, but they could be bastards, too, as the interview with Irving Rousso, founder of Russ Togs, makes clear. But it also shows how the union set limits that disappeared when the work went to third-world sweatshops, where the Triangle Fires of today still kill young girls trapped in locked factories.

Schmatta follows skilled cutter and union leader Joe Raico on his last day at work, fondly reminiscing about his trade and his union, but it also shows the “middle class” victims of the industry’s demise–designers, managers, small business owners.

“I desperately need work,” a woman designer says.

The film's analysis is simplified, and there’s little sense of how this sad historical course might have been changed. Anti-sweatshop campaigner Charles Kernaghan of the National Labor Committee calls for stopping the race to the bottom in the global rag trade by supporting workers’ right to organize. (Unmentioned in the film is Kernaghan's call for legislation blocking imports of products that violate labor rights, such as use of child labor.)

But it seems too late for New York, despite its colorful history. It’s back to rags.

Posted by David Moberg  ·  movies workplace justice  ·  + share/save

Comments

Jon N. 16 Oct 2009
6:52 pm

Thanks, My Dad worked in the rag trade for 35 years. Although he was not Jewish, he used many Yiddish words and phrases when he talked about his work.” Schmatta” was one I heard often.

tom mathews 16 Oct 2009
10:02 pm

The painful experience of many thousands of highly skilled workers in New York City occasioned by the diminution of the garment industry was fully shared by similar workers in my own state of Pennsylvania.
From some 40 years ago, I can still remember a giant billboard erected along U.S. 22 west between the NJ/PA border and Allentown:
“Welcome to Pennsylvania; home to 75,000 members of the International Ladies Garment Workers Union”
Today, there are perhaps less than 4,000 union members working in my state’s “garment” industry, nearly all of them now employed in a small number of large distribution centers where they pack and ship wearing apparel to department stores and discounters, nearly all of it produced off-shore in Asia, the Caribbean, across the border in Mexico, or sewed by appallingly exploited immigrants in the non-union sweatshops of LA and NYC.
The final toll: Across the nation, more than one-half million working families have been forced to sacrifice their very means to a livelihood in the interest of “free trade”...sacrificed to the greed of the business interests and to the disloyalty of so-called “friends of Labor” like John Glenn, Barbara Boxer, Henry Waxman and William Jefferson Clinton.
PLease…do not take my word…feel free to research these politicians own records on legislation that would have secured the jobs of U.S. workers, from the several apparel bills on up to the 1993 NAFTA Agreement.

Gregory A. Butler 18 Oct 2009
12:52 am

Reality Check - except for a brief period (1935-45) when communist garment workers FORCED the International Ladies Garment Workers Union to fight for it’s member, the ILGWU was a racist, sexist, gangster dominated business union who’s male dominated leadership (almost none of whom ever worked in the trade) tolerated open sweatshop conditions in the industry, as long as they got their percentage.

Despite all the social zionist propaganda that tries to prettify the past, the garment unions were corrupt and sexist business unions that went along with the garment bosses sweatshop program for most of the last century.

That’s why Jewish and Italian women fled the industry in the 1950’s and were replaced with Latinos and Asians.

And don’t you dare blame “imports” for the collapse of the New York garment industry!

In the 1960’s, New York garment bosses decided to move the industry down south, where they’d have no unions at all - and the ILGWU went along with the program every step of the way.

So, Brother Moberg, cut the BS and keep it real!

The garment unions were a pox on the labor movement, and we’re better off as a labor movement that they folded!

Please Login to Comment register a new account »

To participate in discussions, please register an account.

retreive lost password »

About this Blog

"Working In These Times" is dedicated to providing independent and incisive coverage of the labor movement and the struggles of workers to obtain safe, healthy and just workplaces. more

WORKING E-NEWSLETTER:
Receive our weekly blog round-up

InTheseTimes.com weekly e-newsletter
WorkingInTheseTimes.com weekly e-newsletter

RSS Subscribe to RSS feed