NYC Transit Workers Hold on to Challenged Raises
December 14
11:16 am
TWU Local 100 members protest in New York City. (Photo courtesy of TWULocal100.org)
By Lindsay Beyerstein
New York's transport workers will keep the raises they won in an arbitration deal with the Metropolitan Transit Authority. On Friday, Manhattan Supreme Court judge O. Peter Sherwood rejected the MTA's bid to have the arbitration deal thrown out.
John Samuelson, the incoming president of Transport Workers Union Local 100, called the ruling "a big win for us."
Sherwood found nothing improper or unusual about the arbitration panel's decision (which I reported on for this blog back in August) to give the transport workers a raise in step with raises received by other city workers. TWU workers will get a raise on the order of 11.3%, phased in over the next three years.
It's no secret that city workers' pay rates tend to rise in step. The MTA knew it was hammering out the TWU contract on the heels of pay raises for teachers, garbage collectors, and other New York City workers.
Yet the MTA repeatedly failed to budget for a comparable increase for transport workers. Perhaps officials were overconfident in their own negotiating skills. In any event, the MTA went on to gamble and lose when it submitted its proposal to the arbitration panel. At the end of the day, the panel thought the transit workers put forward a fairer plan.
Regardless, the MTA is now pleading poverty and trying to blame the TWU for its own ineptitude at the bargaining table and in the courts.
The MTA is facing a significant budget shortfall. The agency learned in early December that a controversial new payroll tax that was supposed to add $1 billion to the MTA's budget would bring in $200 million less than expected.
The State Supreme Court ruling comes at a convenient time for the MTA. The transit authority promises to unveil a series of dramatic "doomsday cuts" in service today. Naturally, the transit authority is using the court decision as an opportunity to blame the union while announcing some tough choices that it would have had to make anyway.
Posted by Lindsay Beyerstein · government negotiations organized labor ·
Please Login to Comment register a new account »
About this Blog
"Working In These Times" is dedicated to providing independent and incisive coverage of the labor movement and the struggles of workers to obtain safe, healthy and just workplaces. more
Recent Posts 
- Guestworkers Sue Employer, as Calls for Immigration Reform Grow Louder March 19
- School Grounds as Battlefield: Political Lessons at an Arabic-themed School March 19
- Battle Brewing Between Mexican Miners, Govt., After Court Rules Strike Illegal March 19
- AFL-CIO: ‘Imperfect’ Health Reform is ‘Important First Step’ March 18
- ‘Friendly’ Commonwealth Games Not So Friendly to Workers March 18
WORKING E-NEWSLETTER:
Receive our weekly blog round-up
Contributors
Blogroll
- Work in Progress (FDL)
- Labor Is Not a Commodity
- United Steelworkers Blog
- Jobs With Justice
- Association for Union Democracy
- National Labor Relations Board
- Open Left
- AFSCME Blog
- Talking Points Memo
- Democracy Now!
- Union Review
- Economic Policy Institute
- Robert Reich
- Left Turn
- Today’s Workplace
- Alternet: Workplace
- AFL-CIO Now Blog
- Change to Win Connect
- Monthly Review
- Talking Union
- Christopher Hayes’ Capitolism
- Labour Start
- Labor Notes
- Working Life
- Dollars and Sense
- American Prospect

Comments
There are not any comments yet.
Start the discussion below!