|
The Chief: The Life of William Randolph Hearst
By David Nasaw
Houghton Mifflin
687 pages, $35
If your notion of William Randolph Hearst still revolves around
a famous sled named "Rosebud," have I got a book for you. David
Nasaw's biography The Chief: The Life of William Randolph Hearst
deftly restores Hearst to a central place in the history of American
culture and politics. This is a terrific read about an astonishing
and exasperating demagogue of a man who re-invented himself more
often than Madonna, and had the time to do it, his life spanning
from 1863 to 1951. With his newspaper empire, mansions, castles,
and his cavorting with Hollywood stars and heads of state, Hearst
was larger than life. Nasaw's re-interpretation of Hearst is also
a surprisingly positive and sympathetic one.
The son of a gold miner, Hearst grew up in San Francisco. In 1886,
when his father
 |
|
The ungrateful subject of the
best movie ever made.
|
ascended to the U.S. Senate, Will Hearst took over his father's newspaper,
the San Francisco Examiner. The newspaper had never done very
well, but Will quickly turned it around. He observed the latest trends
in newspaper publishing, stealing ideas that seemed the most innovative.
As Nasaw notes, the person to watch at the time was Joseph Pulitzer
in New York, then giving birth to a new kind of journalism that appealed
especially to working men and women. Hearst extended Pulitzer's strategy
further. He developed sensational headlines and stories; he paid more
attention to crime and to salacious stories of government corruption.
He made the writing tighter and more colorful. He added more and higher-quality
illustrations.
And Will's paper was, in Nasaw's words, "defiantly pro-labor, anti-capital,
and anti-railroad." It took the same positions that any white union
man of the day would have. The Examiner strongly defended
the right to unionize and strike, and fiercely attacked the presence
of cheap Chinese workers, who allegedly stole jobs from Americans.
But Hearst's paper stood up for the interests of European immigrants,
building support among Italian and Jewish communities in particular.
Within a few years Hearst had made his paper essential to white
working people: "Like the workingman's saloon and the political
clubhouse, Hearst's newspaper served as an unofficial public agency,
an honest broker, and unpaid intermediary between the people and
their government."
These tactics would serve as Hearst's basic formula for success
in the years to come. He gradually refined them and added an element
of spectacle, using his newspapers to create news as well as report
it. Although Nasaw nimbly analyzes and rejects the notion that Hearst
pushed the United States into the Spanish-American War ("That Hearst
has received so large a measure of credit or blame for that 'glorious
war' is a tribute to his genius as a self-promoter"), he also shows
how Hearst cagily benefitted from and exploited the war.
|