On September 11, a little past 8 a.m., William Wong flew out of
New York headed for his Bay Area hometown. Author of Yellow Journalist:
Dispatches from Asian America, Wong was on the last leg of a long
journey from Durban, South Africa, where he had attended the U.N.
World Conference Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia
and Related Intolerance (WCAR). About 90 minutes into his flight,
the plane was ordered to land in Indianapolis, where he learned
of the hijackings that killed thousands of people in the attacks
on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
Wong was stunned and sickened. "In sorting through my feelings
and thoughts," he wrote in an Internet dispatch published at www.igc.org,
where activists swapped notes after the conference, "I detected
a connection between the U.N. conference and the tragic September
11 events that may not at first seem obvious."
The connection he found was between the grievances of Osama bin
Laden, the accused mastermind of the attacks, and the gripes of
many WCAR delegates, non-governmental organizations and activists.
"Perhaps I have been too sheltered in recent years, too American-centric
and not fully aware of broiling negative feelings toward the United
States," Wong wrote.
For many who witnessed global disgust with arrogant U.S. unilateralism
at the WCAR, the events of September 11 were like a ghoulish exclamation
point. "It's a tragedy that some people still feel they can solve
the problems of the world through violence," says Conrad Worrill,
who attended the WCAR on behalf of the National Black United Front.
"But remember what Dr. King said about the United States being the
world's most violent country? Remember what Malcolm said about chickens
coming home to roost?"
But Worrill prefers to focus on another Malcolm X quote: "The
American black man needed to recognize that he had a strong, airtight
case to take the United States before the United Nations on a formal
accusation of denial of human rights,' " Malcolm wrote in his 1965
autobiography. For Worrill and many of the black nationalist forces
he represented there, the WCAR was a success if only for furthering
Malcolm's vision of internationalizing the African-American struggle.
He also found victory in the conference's final declaration, which
described the transatlantic slave trade as a "crime against humanity,"
stated that racism has economic roots and said demands for reparations
to victims of the slave trade and colonialism were valid and worthy
of further examination. Worrill says various members of the "Durban
400" (the WCAR's American attendees) and others plan to push the
reparations issue in a demonstration scheduled for October 14 in
Washington.
There also were sounds of discord. The conference was "elitist
and undemocratic," says JoNina Abron, a delegate from the Southwest
Michigan Coalition Against Racism and Police Brutality. "Those who
accused the Palestinians and their supporters of hijacking' the
conference have got it all wrong," she wrote on the www.igc.org
site. "From the beginning to the very end, the conference was hijacked
by the United Nations bureaucrats themselves." Abron complained
that NGOs labored to craft a declaration and recommended an action
plan that was summarily rejected by Mary Robinson, U.N. High Commissioner
for Human Rights and head of the WCAR. Robinson objected to the
use of "hateful" language accusing Israel of being an "apartheid"
state and engaging in "genocide" against Palestinians. Abron wrote
that the "watered-down document that was adopted did not reflect
the views of the majority of NGO delegates."
David Horne disagrees. "The WCAR cannot be adjudged a failure
at any level," says Horne, a writer who teaches at California State
University-Northridge. Horne lists several benefits gained from
participation in the conference. Among them are global participation
with several thousand others; giving voice to the harm being done
to women, caste groups and victims of xenophobia; and the development
of broad networks for activists and attendees.
Author Makani Themba also came away with a sense of triumph. "For
me, the most important thing is that we now have a global network
of like-minded folk who can strategize and respond."
|