May 15 , 2000


Collateral Damage
BY JOHN PILGER
Ten years of sanctions in Iraq

Under Siege
BY ANTHONY ARNOVE
Hans von Sponeck steps down

The IMF: Kill It or Fix It?
BY G. PASCAL ZACHARY

How to Fix the IMF
BY DAVID MOBERG
First, do no harm

Water Fallout
BY JIM SHULTZ
Bolivians battle globalization

ICANN: Secret government of the Internet?
BY STEVEN HILL
The fight over who will control the Web

The Big Payback
BY SALIM MUWAKKIL
African-Americans renew the call for reparations


News & Views

Editorial
BY JASON VEST
Capital crimes

Appall-O-Meter
BY DAVID FUTRELLE

A Terry Laban Cartoon

No Justice for Janitors
BY DAVID BACON
L.A. workers take the first step toward a nationwide strike

Wal-Martyrs
BY KARI LYDERSEN
Unionizing means job cuts at the world's largest retailer

Fishy Business
BY JEFF SHAW
Washington State is failing to protect endangered salmon

Wasted
BY JEFF ST. CLAIR
Russia moves ahead with shady nuclear scheme

Profile
BY DAVID MOBERG
Luis Alfonso Velasquez: Wanted man


Culture

The Culture Vultures
BY LAURA BRAHM
BOOKS: Art as instrument of foreign policy

Left in the Dust
BY TED KLEINE
BOOKS: A HIstory of the Small & the Invisible

Queer Godfather
BY DOUG IRELAND
BOOKS: Martin Duberman, intellectual

No Jacket Required
BY JOSHUA ROTHKOPF
FILM: American Psycho

Rememberance of Things Trashed
BY CALEB MASON

 

Left in the Dust

By Ted Kleine

Dust: A History of the
Small & the Invisible
By Joseph A. Amato
University of California Press
250 pages, $22.50

Does Mr. Clean really have a place in history alongside Galileo and Pasteur? He does in Joseph A. Amato's epic essay, Dust: A History of the Small & the Invisible, which insists that a society's level of civilization can be measured by the glow on its kitchen floors.

Credit: Rinnert

In the Middle Ages, centuries before Proctor met Gamble, "men and women were intimate with dust in ways beyond contemporary imagination." Dust rose from dirt roads and rimed hair and skin, marking peasants as a grubby, dark-complexioned race. As soot, it blackened the walls of huts. People were even intimate in dust: "All over the world, people of times past fell asleep and woke up in dusty beds."

To be covered with dust was to be close to the earth, an association that has never helped anyone's social standing. "Filthy" and "dirty" became synonyms for immorality, and "rising from the muck and mire" meant advancement in the world. The upper classes invented complicated manners to separate themselves from "rustics" who wiped snot on their sleeves.

Dirt and dust were shunned partly because they smelled so putrid, but also because even the ancients had a sense that they harbored disease. The discovery and defeat of viruses, germs and bacteria was the number-one benefit of the world's getting tough on grime. Until the 17th century, dust "was an omnipresent boundary ... between the visible and the invisible." But then came the microscope, and scientists could map the anatomy of the ant and study the lives of single-celled organisms.

Ted Kleine frequently writes for In These Times and the Chicago Reader.

 

 


In These Times © 2000
Vol. 24, No. 12