June 12 , 2000


Poverty in America:

Turning the Tables
BY NEIL DEMAUSE
Welfare reform face a time limit of its own.

Allied Forces
BY TED KLEINE
The National Campaign for Jobs and Income Support

Poverty in a Gilded Age
BY ANNETTE FUENTES
An interview with Frances Fox Piven.

Out of Sight
BY KARI LYDERSEN
In many cities, being homeless is against the law.

Leave the Kids Alone
BY MIKE MALES
Poverty is the real problem

The Union Difference
BY DAVID MOBERG

Down and Out on Polk Street
PHOTOGRAPHS BY KEVIN WEINSTEIN


Other Features:

Star Wars: Episode Two
BYJEFFERY ST. CLAIR
The Pentagon's latest missile defense fantasy.

"This Is Not Life. This Is Prison"
BY RICHARD MERTENS
Kosovo one year after the NATO bombing.

Bosnian Serbs Still Look to Belgrade
BY PAUL HOCKENOS


News & Views

Editorial
BY JOEL BLEIFUSS
Memo to third parties: Face Reality.

Appall-O-Meter
BY DAVID FUTRELLE

A Terry Laban Cartoon

Marching On
BY DAVE LINDORFF
Unity 2000 plans to disrupt this summer's GOP convention

The Other Side of the Street
BY KIM PHILLIPS-FEIN
Food workers target Goldman Sachs

Going to Waste
BY ERIC WELTMAN
Health Care Without Harm cleans up toxic hospitals

Profile
BY KARI LYDERSEN
Flour Power

Forgotten America
BY Juan Gonzalez
Bombs Away


Culture

Ancient Daze
BY JOSHUA ROTHKOPF
FILM: Ridley Scott's Gladiator

A Class by Itself
BY BILL BOISVERT
BOOKS: David Brooks' Bobos in Paradise

A Different Point of View
BY PAT AUFDERHEIDE
TV: P.O.V. on PBS

 

A Class By Itself

By Bill Boisvert

Bobos in Paradise: The New Upper
Class and How They Got There
By David Brooks
Simon & Schuster
284 pages, $25


For centuries the bourgeoisie has fought a running battle with bohemia, pitting bourgeois sobriety against bohemian intoxication, continence against sexual abandon, calculation against emotion, science against nature, materialism against art, hierarchy against equality. Things came to a head in the '60s, when long hair and tie-dye squared off against brush cut and pin stripes; the bohemians routed the bourgeoisie, only to be driven back by the Reaganite reaction of the '80s. But the culture wars are finally over, David Brooks writes, for bourgeois and bohemian have finally realized that, working together, they can conquer the world.

Brooks' new book, Bobos in Paradise: The New Upper Classes and How They Got There, is about the vanguard of this new cultural synergy. "Bobos" means "bourgeois bohemians," the highly educated information and technology workers at the forefront of the New Economy. The hallmark of Bobos, Brooks writes, is their ability to reconcile opposites. They are the tatooed dot-com executives who put in 100-hour weeks overthrowing the corporate status quo. They are the well-heeled exurbanites who showcase their solidarity with the downtrodden by decorating their million-dollar homes with peasant handicrafts. They are the genteel denizens of S/M clubs whose Web sites primly advertise their antiseptically safe debauchery and extol mutual respect through bondage. Bobo consumerism is ecologically sensitive and morally uplifting, built around natural fibers, crusading long-distance carriers and conscientious recycling. Hailing from the nation's exclusive zip codes, Bobos pride themselves on their informality and dishevelledness. They are an anti-elitist elite.

While not exactly new, Brooks' observations about this much-observed group are often fresh and engaging. Yet the beguiling inconsistencies that Brooks riffs upon raise troubling issues that his book never really confronts. Are the self-contradictory mores of this demographic an eclectic third way between doctrinaire extremes, or just so much hypocrisy? Are all social conflicts really a matter of clashing cultural sensibilities? Do anti-elitist manners signify the demise of the ruling elite, or the success of a kinder, gentler ruling elite that has co-opted and neutralized all opposition? Can a ruling elite ever be kind and gentle?

Brooks is a senior editor at The Weekly Standard and quotes extensively from older neoconservative publications like Commentary. By positing the Bobos as the synthesis of the world-historical dialectic between the '60s and the '80s, his book is really a reappraisal of the Baby Boomers from a neocon perspective. Born in reaction to the excesses of the New Left, but rooted in a tradition of Jewish intellectualism, neoconservatism has never been entirely at ease with the libertarians, militiamen and fundamentalists who make up its allies on the right. Brooks implies that the time is ripe for a neocon rapprochement with the Age of Aquarius.

According to Brooks, the Bobos emerged after World War II, when new SAT-based admissions policies at elite universities-the gateway into the ranks of the powerful-opened the Ivy League to bright students from modest backgrounds. At the same time, the postwar shift to an "information economy" put a premium on the skills of the new university-educated technocrats. These developments spelled doom for the old East Coast Wasp elite, whose privilege derived from family connections and money; they were first mocked and then overthrown by the Bobos.

Thus, unlike past elites of "blood and wealth," the Bobos are a meritocracy. Membership in their ranks is based on an impartial test, while their many advanced degrees make them natural leaders in an economy where "ideas and knowledge are at least as vital ... as natural resources and finance capital." The talented, hard-working Bobocracy has done away with the galling mismatch between ability and social rank that so incensed the Third Estate in its salad days, and quieted all the Veblenesque wisecracks about the leisure class.


 

 


In These Times © 2000
Vol. 24, No. 14