Michael Abramowitz, Robin Wright and Thomas E. Ricks in WaPo report that, in his speech tonight, Bush will be overtly contradicting his own longstanding claims to let military commanders determine Iraq strategy. And that "some staff members on the National Security Council became enamored of the idea of sending more troops to Iraq in part because it was not a key feature of Baker-Hamilton" (the Iraq Study Group report). And that the whole point of the "surge" escalation is merely for public relations purposes rather than an actual attempt to accomplish any substantive goals. In the end, the White House favored the idea of more troops as one visible and dramatic step the administration could take. Paul Kiel at TPM Muckraker and Chris at AMERICAblog comment on the story.
More articles by Brian Zick
FBI Director Mueller Contradicts Gonzales
Brian Zick
Democrats Request Special Counsel Be Appointed to Investigate Perjury Charges Against Gonzales
Brian Zick
Rove and Deputy Jennings Subpoenaed by Senate Judiciary Committee
Brian Zick
Similar articles
FeatureLabor Organizer of the Year
Building Bridges and Erasing Jail Debt: Katherine Passley
The winner of our Labor Organizer of the Year Award co-runs a member-led worker center in Miami for people with criminal records and their families — the first organization of its kind in the country.
Kim Kelly
LaborFeatureRural America
Southern Workers Prepare For An Uphill Battle Under Trump
For too long, the labor movement ignored the South. Today, Southern workers are taking on entrenched racism, right-to-work laws and the incoming Trump administration as they organize for their rights.
Stephen Franklin
ViewpointCulture
Big Back Panic: Fatphobia's Rebrand
Anti-fatness is back with a vengeance so aggressive it puts 1990s “heroin chic” to shame.
Tee Noir