Justice David Souter wrote the majority opinion in Georgia v Randolph. Rookie Chief Justice John Roberts wrote a critical dissent.
SCOTUSblog has links to the majority opinion, concurrences and dissents
The decision narrowed the circumstances under which police authorities can enter and search a home without a warrant. The case arose in a domestic dispute situation, wherein the husband refused search permission and the wife gave permission to police.
David Stout, in The New York Times report on the decision, called attention to Roberts' grievance, and Souter's cold smackdown:
And alluding to the chief justice's complaint that the majority did not address what would happen if there were a third household occupant involved, Justice Souter said, "We decide the case before us, not a different one."
More articles by Brian Zick
FBI Director Mueller Contradicts Gonzales
Brian Zick
Democrats Request Special Counsel Be Appointed to Investigate Perjury Charges Against Gonzales
Brian Zick
Rove and Deputy Jennings Subpoenaed by Senate Judiciary Committee
Brian Zick
Similar articles
FeatureLabor Organizer of the Year
Building Bridges and Erasing Jail Debt: Katherine Passley
The winner of our Labor Organizer of the Year Award co-runs a member-led worker center in Miami for people with criminal records and their families — the first organization of its kind in the country.
Kim Kelly
LaborFeatureRural America
Southern Workers Prepare For An Uphill Battle Under Trump
For too long, the labor movement ignored the South. Today, Southern workers are taking on entrenched racism, right-to-work laws and the incoming Trump administration as they organize for their rights.
Stephen Franklin
ViewpointCulture
Big Back Panic: Fatphobia's Rebrand
Anti-fatness is back with a vengeance so aggressive it puts 1990s “heroin chic” to shame.
Tee Noir