Business as usual in the disinformation age.
The backlash against high-stakes exams.
For unions to survive, they must organize in Dixie.
The Permanent War.
A double standard on terrorism.
Israel targets Arafat.
Russia's last independent network goes under.
Dumping on Nevada
The Department of Energy approves Yucca Mountain as a nuclear waste site.
Starbucks, Nike, others profit from inmate labor.
Against the Odds
Public housing residents eke out some rare victories.
Autumn of the Patriarch
BOOKS: What a difference a pop makes.
BOOKS: Carey McWilliams and the Fool's Paradise.
MUSIC: It's to Change punk rock.
The Docs' Good News
FILM: Documentaries are alive and well at Sundance.
Tony Kushner, Native Son
INTERVIEW: The playwright on America, Israel and terror.
February 1, 2002
The Permanent War
n his State of the Union address, George W. Bush laid out his plans for the
coming year: a permanent state of war that will be financed in large part by
cuts in domestic spending.
All but declaring war, Bush said that Iraq, North Korea, Iran and their
terrorist allies constitute an axis of evil. He promised not to
wait on events while danger gathers and not to stand by while peril
draws closer and closer. Axis powers be warned: Our war on terror
is only begun.
In so doing Bush sided with Pentagon hawks, who since September 11 have vociferously
advocated a war against Iraq. Such an extensive war will be expensive. Bush
heralded his plan to implement the the largest increase in defense spending
in two decades (putting the budget 14 percent above the Cold War average)
and develop and deploy effective missile defenses.
As far as the economy goes, he proposed that we defeat this recession
by making permanent last years tax cuts, the bulk of which
benefited the rich, and by running a deficit that will be small and short.
This appears to be a tactical maneuver on the part of the Republicans. Even
with a short-term deficit, the combination of continued tax cuts and increased
military spending will require reductions in government programs. Once the short
term passes and balanced budgets return, the axe will really fall. Expect the
Republicans to exploit wartime budgetary constraints to take out programs that
have been on the Republican hit list for years.
In his speech, Bush again called for Social Security privatization. He didnt
note that a personal retirement account heavily invested in a company like Enron
would yield only privation. In fact, he didnt mention Enron at all. The
war-time president didnt need to.
With few exceptions, members of Congressconcerned about their re-election
prospectshave been reluctant to take on this popular president directly.
The milquetoast response by House Minority Leader Richard Gephardt that followed
the presidential address failed to point out Enrons close working relationship
with the White House and the fact that CEO Kenneth LayKenny Boy
to his friend George W.helped pump $4.5 million of Enron lucre into Republican
Bush is inoculated against criticism by his immense popularity. That popularity,
like the war on terror, shows signs of becoming self-perpetuating.
No one wants to take on the man who has promised to protect Americans and the
homeland against tens of thousands
of dangerous killers
spread throughout the world like ticking time bombs, scheduled to go
off without warning. For should the threat be defused, what would we be
left with? A president who is the craven rent boy of transnational energy corporations
and Pentagon contractors.
Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Illinois) is one of the few vocal Bush critics. The
reality is that every single opportunity hes had to help working people
and retired people, she told the Chicago Tribune, hes chosen
instead to help the wealthiest individuals and corporations.
Hers was a rare voice of dissent in a mainstream press that has been loathe
to question the wisdom of administration policy. On January 23, a group of 18
foreign affairs experts, including high-ranking former military leaders, intelligence
analysts and diplomats, released an open letter to President Bush urging him
not to extend military action to Iraq. As one of the signatories,
Ambassador Edward Peck, the former chief of the U.S. mission to Iraq, commented,
If we are truly interested in and concerned over the vital issues of peace
and stability in the Middle East, attacking Iraq is precisely what we should
Their letter, organized by the Institute for Policy Studies, was all but ignored
by the U.S. mainstream media. Today, views like those of Peck, who was also
the deputy director of President Reagans task force on terrorism, are
beyond the pale. America is at war.
Chris Lehmann, former culture and managing editor of In These Times,
is a senior editor for the Washington Post Book World.