In These Times    
Independent News and Views
HomeAbout UsSubscribeArchivesProject Censored
   
Search The Site
Advanced Search

Features

What really happened in Jenin?
 
The left must confront anti-Semitism head-on.
 
Every One of Us Has a Teaspoon
 
 
Hugo Chávez is back in power. Now what?
 
Jean-Marie Le Pen’s strong showing shocks the French left.
 
Too Cruel for School
Students stand up for workers rights.
 

Views

Editorial
Dictatorship or Democracy?
 
Manufacturing postfeminism.
 
 
 

News

75,000 gather in Washington.
 
Crunch Time
Can Nevada derail Yucca Mountain?
 
To fund “clean elections” Mass. judge orders state property sold.
 
Workers Wronged
The NLRB is stacked against labor.
 
In Delaware, Not Easy Being Green
In Person: Alan Muller
 

Culture

Words To Live By
BOOKS: Ben Marcus’ Notable American Women.
 
MUSIC: Wilco returns.
 
FILM: Not your ordinary Teacher.
 
Accuracy Watch
 

 
April 26, 2002
Appall-o-Meter
Dead Peasants 8.1

Back in 1994, Wal-Mart launched a program promising its employees a $5,000 death benefit. The company was so determined its workers should take advantage of the program that it threatened any who turned it down with the forfeiture of their health insurance. What the company did not tell employees was that it had taken out life insurance policies on them, with Wal-Mart as the beneficiary.

Now lawyers in Texas are mounting a class-action suit against Wal-Mart to reclaim the benefits—as much as $64,000 apiece—for the estates of dead employees. Life insurance policies for employees, sometimes referred to as “dead peasant policies,” are not uncommon among large U.S. corporations, who use them as a tax dodge. The policies are legal in many states, but not in Texas. According to the Houston Chronicle, 5 to 6 million corporate serfs have life insurance policies held on them by Fortune 500 magnates, and Wal-Mart holds some 350,000.

Extreme Photos, Pt. I 6.2

Here’s a kindly tip for all you edgy shutterbugs out there: If you’re going to shoot controversial material—dead bodies, say—develop your own damn film. It is a lesson Thomas Condon, a suburban Cincinnati commercial photographer, will get to mull in the pokey. Condon thoughtlessly dropped off some film he had taken in the Hamilton County Morgue, and his local photo lab dropped a dime to the cops. Now Condon’s doing two and a half years for “gross abuse of a corpse.”

Bereaved families were outraged to learn that the mortal remains of their loved ones were posed with props such as sheet music, a key and an apple. Condon argued that he intended to crop the photos to hide the identities of the corpses, and that the pictures were part of a “brutally honest” artistic project. That cut no ice with Judge Norbert Nadel. “They’re not art,” he said of the photos. “They’re sick, they’re disgusting, they’re disrespectful, and really the worst invasion of privacy.”

Actually, the worst invasion of privacy may have been carried out by police and prosecutors, who released the photos to the public, and by local television stations, who broadcast them. “They didn’t care,” Condon told Cincinatti’s City Beat. “And they’re calling me reckless.”

Extreme Photos, Pt. II 6.9

Another tip: Guns don’t kill people. Dipshit gun enthusiasts kill people. Angela Aho, a 20-year-old Minnesota college student, died from a bullet to the head she suffered during a homework photo shoot. According to the St. Paul Pioneer Press, Aho and a fellow student had asked Brett Lessard, 24, a friend (and, coincidentally, the son of a Minnesota state senator), to pose for them. After shooting pictures of Lessard and his dog, Aho wanted something more dramatic. Lessard thought it might be cool to point his Glock handgun at the camera. As he raised his arm, the gun fired a bullet through Aho’s eye, killing her.


Return to top of the page.





2002 The Institute for Public Affairs | Contact webmaster.
home | about us | subscribe | archives | project censored