10 Planks the GOP Doesn’t Want You To See

Bhaskar Sunkara

Paul Ryan speaking at the Republican National Convention

Beneath the gloss of Paul Ryan’s convention speech – a series of wildly inaccurate statements that people somehow found inspiring–is extremist and unpopular politics.

Here’s the complete PDF of that 2012 Republican Party platform, the product of a committee chaired by Virginia Gov. Robert McDonnell.

Ten planks that Republicans might rather keep buried:

1) Money in politics? No problem. We oppose any restrictions or conditions that would discourage Americans from exercising their constitutional right to enter the political fray or limit their commitment to their ideals,” the document says

2) A blanket ban on abortion, without exception for rape or incest. They’re still opposed to the Morning-After” pill, too.

3) More government-funded, abstinence-only sexual ed for teens. Because we know how well that works.

4) Republicans want to bring back the military’s Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy, which prevented out homosexuals from serving.

5) Gay marriage is to be eradicated, even as it becomes more popular nationally.

6) Austerity cometh. Social security virtually privatized, even though there isn’t really a crisis there.

7) For the ever-popular Medicare program: an increase in the age of eligibility, plus the transition of the program into a voucher system where the government only pays a fixed amount to users. Seniors would pay more out of pocket and Medicare as we know it would be eliminated.

8) Immigration policy: The Republican Party is divided between those who favor strict enforcement-style mechanisms, and those who realize that cheap immigrant labor is vital for key industries like agriculture. The latter won in the platform, but it still isn’t likely to forestall the demographic disaster that awaits Republicans, with more and more Latinos perceiving them as anti-immigrant.

9) Compounding the problem of immigrant appeal, the new platform affirms that English is the nation’s official language.”

10) Racially-tinged rhetoric attacking Democrats for replacing civil engineering with social engineering as it pursues an exclusively urban vision of dense housing and government transit.”

The Republican vision of the 21st century – one part austerity, one part reactionary social policy, one part latent racial resentment – doesn’t seem like a winning gameplan. The fact that Romney has a chance is testament only to the weakness of a neoliberal Obama adminstration.

Please consider supporting our work.

I hope you found this article important. Before you leave, I want to ask you to consider supporting our work with a donation. In These Times needs readers like you to help sustain our mission. We don’t depend on—or want—corporate advertising or deep-pocketed billionaires to fund our journalism. We’re supported by you, the reader, so we can focus on covering the issues that matter most to the progressive movement without fear or compromise.

Our work isn’t hidden behind a paywall because of people like you who support our journalism. We want to keep it that way. If you value the work we do and the movements we cover, please consider donating to In These Times.

Bhaskar Sunkara is the founding editor of Jacobin magazine. Follow him on Twitter: @sunraysunray.
Illustrated cover of Gaza issue. Illustration shows an illustrated representation of Gaza, sohwing crowded buildings surrounded by a wall on three sides. Above the buildings is the sun, with light shining down. Above the sun is a white bird. Text below the city says: All Eyes on Gaza
Get 10 issues for $19.95

Subscribe to the print magazine.