This Is a Health Crisis—Stop Treating It Like a War

Even by his standards, Trump is a terrible wartime president

Joel Bleifuss

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during the daily briefing on the novel coronavirus, COVID-19, in the Brady Briefing Room at the White House on March 31, 2020, in Washington, DC. (Photo by Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty)

Donald Trump’s dithering and denialism in the early months of the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic will result in unimaginable numbers of dead Americans. Now, however, those are casualties of war. Parroting the talking points of his former advisor, Steve Bannon, Trump is marketing himself as the wartime president America needs. As Bannon, who now hosts the War Room: Pandemic radio show, explained: Churchill rose to the occasion and secured his place in history. Trump’s moment is here, to grasp or to lose.”

If we are at war, it behooves us to ask: Which side is Trump on?

At his March 18 COVID-19 briefing, the commander in chief updated the nation on important developments in our war against the Chinese virus.” He spoke of an upcoming meeting with nurses on the frontlines.” And he invoked World War II:

And now it’s our time. We must sacrifice together because we are all in this together and we’ll come through together. It’s the invisible enemy. That’s always the toughest enemy: the invisible enemy. But we’re going to defeat the invisible enemy. I think we’re going to do it even faster than we thought. And it will be a complete victory. It’ll be a total victory.

The problem? This is a public health crisis, not a war.

We are confronting a pandemic that could take the lives of untold millions. The moment requires sound science and public policies that put a premium on human life. Unfortunately, both are in short supply in the Trump White House.

But, let’s suspend disbelief and play along with Trump’s wartime conceit. If we are at war, it behooves us to ask: Which side is Trump on?

Let’s say COVID-19 is the wartime foe. Does that mean Trump is playing the part of an Axis Sally, broadcasting enemy propaganda?

Trump’s wartime strategy has been to first create an alternate reality through lies, then to lie about the lies. First, One day it’s like a miracle — it will disappear.” Then, I’ve always known this is a real — this is a pandemic. I felt it was a pandemic long before it was called a pandemic. I’ve always viewed it as very serious.”

Only once the bodies began stacking up did Trump began to adopt a more serious mien. But it took him weeks to move the GOP’s Grim Reaper governors like Greg Abbott in Texas, Ron DeSantis in Florida and Tate Reeves of Mississippi to take action.

In the months ahead, the death toll of this public policy failure will be there for all to see. Yet, according to Gallup, Trump’s overall approval rating has risen 5 points, to 49%, with 60% of Americans satisfied with how he is handling the crisis.

The only explanation for such widespread ignorance is that more Americans than ever are turning to the ABC, CBS and NBC nightly news. When the networks’ nightly news programs have, on average, 22 ad-free minutes to present the news, they are going to cover the daily press briefings with short, edited video clips — clips that fail to capture Trump’s daily display of lunacy and narcissism.

The problem is not lost on some in the journalism community. KUOW, Seattle’s NPR station, announced March 24 it will no longer broadcast the president’s daily briefings because it can’t fact-check the pattern of false or misleading information” fast enough.

At In These Times, we, too, choose not to drink the Trump Kool-Aid. We have doubled down with daily coverage of the COVID-19 crisis on InThe​se​Times​.com, which is now read by a record number of visitors. The issue you hold in your hands includes important stories and perspectives you won’t see on the nightly news — backed with sound science and predicated on the principle that every human life matters.

Please consider supporting our work.

I hope you found this article important. Before you leave, I want to ask you to consider supporting our work with a donation. In These Times needs readers like you to help sustain our mission. We don’t depend on—or want—corporate advertising or deep-pocketed billionaires to fund our journalism. We’re supported by you, the reader, so we can focus on covering the issues that matter most to the progressive movement without fear or compromise.

Our work isn’t hidden behind a paywall because of people like you who support our journalism. We want to keep it that way. If you value the work we do and the movements we cover, please consider donating to In These Times.

Joel Bleifuss, a former director of the Peace Studies Program at the University of Missouri-Columbia, is the editor & publisher of In These Times, where he has worked since October 1986.

Illustrated cover of Gaza issue. Illustration shows an illustrated representation of Gaza, sohwing crowded buildings surrounded by a wall on three sides. Above the buildings is the sun, with light shining down. Above the sun is a white bird. Text below the city says: All Eyes on Gaza
Get 10 issues for $19.95

Subscribe to the print magazine.