On May 20, federal and New York City authorities arrested four men on charges of plotting domestic terrorist attacks. Assistant U.S. Attorney Eric Snyder described the men as being eager “to bring death to Jews.”
This story is depressingly familiar. With apocalyptic rhetoric, the authorities herald an arrest, boasting that their efforts, with the aid of confidential informants, have foiled another homegrown terrorist plot. However, it soon becomes clear the alleged plotters were incapable of committing these terrorist acts without the participation and provocation of the informants.
This agent-provocateur scenario has played out in two other cases. One of them was the so-called “Liberty City 7” case, in which seven men of Haitian descent living in Miami’s impoverished Liberty City neighborhood were charged in June 2006 with conspiracy to commit terrorism.
In that case, an undercover informant, experiencing legal trouble and flush with $140,000 in FBI cash, struck up a friendship with the men and helped to conceive the plot. He suggested the targets and supplied much of the financing and equipment. Their high-profile arrests received media attention when former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales announced the seven men plotted to create an “Islamic army” bent on “killing devils.” None of them turned out to be Muslims.
After two mistrials and the acquittals of two suspects, jurors convicted five of the original seven men on May 12. In a May 16 editorial, the Miami Herald concluded, “This wasn’t so much a case of the FBI interrupting an ongoing terror plot, but of the agency providing a blueprint for it.” The five men face sentences between 30 and 70 years.
The second case, revealed in June 2007, concerns an alleged conspiracy to blow up fuel tanks, terminal buildings and the web of fuel pipes running underneath Kennedy International Airport.
A confidential informant also set this case in motion. The informant was a convicted drug dealer whose sentence, according to the criminal complaint, “is pending as part of his cooperation agreement with the government.” The equation is clear: the bigger the bust, the lighter his sentence.
In the most recent New York case, the informant identified by the New York Post as Shahed Hussain, became an FBI mole in 2003, after he was busted for identity fraud. He targeted four financially strapped ex-cons (David Cromitie, David Williams, Onta Williams and Laguerre Payen) who occasionally attended a mosque in Newburgh, N.Y. – about 70 miles north of New York City.
Hussain helped the four men conspire to detonate explosives outside the Riverdale Temple and nearby Riverdale Jewish Center and also to shoot down military aircraft at the Air National Guard Base in Newburgh with surface-to-air missiles. He purchased cell phones and a camera in order to plan the attack, and the FBI provided the informant with disabled explosive devices, as well as a bum Stinger missile.
According to relatives of the arrested men, Hussain also supplied them with cash, food, rent money and drugs. Elizabeth McWilliams, the mother of suspect David Williams, told the New York Daily News that the informant even offered to pay for his sick brother’s liver transplant.
Law enforcement officials first said the men converted to Islam while incarcerated and had religious motives for the plot, but none of the men turned out to be practicing Muslims. It seems more likely they were lured by financial incentives.
Conservative commentators have pounced on the Newburgh story as proof that relocating hardcore terrorists to U.S. prisons would endanger national security. Writing for the National Review Online, Peter Kirsanow argues the arrest of the Newburgh suspects “should be an obvious caution to President Obama regarding his plan to close Guantanamo and possibly relocate the inmates to U.S. prisons.”
In New York City, where most of the men lived, the unemployment rate for black men is about 50 percent, according to a two-year-old study by the Community Service Society, and most experts believe the situation has worsened. In such communities, there is an increasing sense of economic desperation that can easily be exploited by unscrupulous actors.
Employing cash-dispensing FBI informants to troll for impoverished malcontents is an inefficient and tawdry way to combat international terrorism.
I hope you found this article important. Before you leave, I want to ask you to consider supporting our work with a donation. In These Times needs readers like you to help sustain our mission. We don’t depend on—or want—corporate advertising or deep-pocketed billionaires to fund our journalism. We’re supported by you, the reader, so we can focus on covering the issues that matter most to the progressive movement without fear or compromise.
Our work isn’t hidden behind a paywall because of people like you who support our journalism. We want to keep it that way. If you value the work we do and the movements we cover, please consider donating to In These Times.
Salim Muwakkil is a senior editor of In These Times and host of “The Salim Muwakkil Show” on radio station WVON-AM in Chicago. Muwakkil was also contributing columnist for both the Chicago Sun-Times (1993 – 1997) and the Chicago Tribune (1998 – 2005). He is also a co-founder of Pacifica News’ network daily “Democracy Now” program and served as an adjunct professor at Northwestern University, University of Illinois, the Art Institute of Chicago and Chicago’s Columbia College.
