Susan G. Komen Apologizes for Dumping Planned Parenthood

Lindsay Beyerstein

The Susan G. Komen Foundation has apologized for cutting off funding to Planned Parenthood for breast health programs. The Dallas Morning News is reporting that founder and CEO Nancy Brinker and the Susan G. Komen Board of Directors released an apology this morning.

The statement, reprinted in full on the DMN site and available on the Komen blog, begins, We want to apologize to the American public for recent decisions that cast doubt upon our commitment to our mission of saving women’s lives.”

In the statement, Brinker and the board continue to insist–in bold, so it must be true–that their decision was not politically motivated. They insist that they were merely trying to honor their fiduciary duty by not giving money to organizations under investigation. If so, why apologize? Unless of course your understanding of your fiduciary duty is so clouded by anti-choice mythology that you have lost sight of your organization’s interests.

Despite the official denial, three insiders with first-hand knowledge of Komen’s deliberations told Jeff Goldberg of the Atlantic that the new rule was an excuse to cut off Planned Parenthood. They said Komen finally succumbed after years of pressure from anti-choicers.

The timeline fits the insiders’ account. The rule was implemented after anti-choice Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-FL) launched his investigation and Planned Parenthood was the only grantee affected. (Stearns has been excoriated by his Democratic committee colleagues for using a frivolous investigation to harass Planned Parenthood as part of his ideological vendetta against the nation’s leading women’s health services provider.)

Komen’s decision was even harder to justify on non-political grounds because nobody suggested that Planned Parenthood was misallocating Komen breast money for abortions. Komen claims to be absolutely scrupulous in monitoring its grantees’ activity, so they would know if anything was amiss on the breast side.

The Stearns investigation is about whether Planned Parenthood is spending federal money on abortion. It is an anti-choice article of faith, which Komen VP Karen Handel espoused during her gubernatorial campaign, that Planned Parenthood spends federal dollars on abortion. Actually, Planned Parenthood gets audited every year to make sure this is not happening.

Komen has promised to mend its ways, We will amend the criteria to make clear that disqualifying investigations must be criminal and conclusive in nature and not political.” That’s a tacit admission that Stearns investigation was political. Using a nakedly political investigation as an excuse to cut off Planned Parenthood was itself a political decision. Komen’s contrition won’t change that.

Please consider supporting our work.

I hope you found this article important. Before you leave, I want to ask you to consider supporting our work with a donation. In These Times needs readers like you to help sustain our mission. We don’t depend on—or want—corporate advertising or deep-pocketed billionaires to fund our journalism. We’re supported by you, the reader, so we can focus on covering the issues that matter most to the progressive movement without fear or compromise.

Our work isn’t hidden behind a paywall because of people like you who support our journalism. We want to keep it that way. If you value the work we do and the movements we cover, please consider donating to In These Times.

Lindsay Beyerstein is an award-winning investigative journalist and In These Times staff writer who writes the blog Duly Noted. Her stories have appeared in Newsweek, Salon, Slate, The Nation, Ms. Magazine, and other publications. Her photographs have been published in the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times’ City Room. She also blogs at The Hillman Blog (http://​www​.hill​man​foun​da​tion​.org/​h​i​l​l​m​a​nblog), a publication of the Sidney Hillman Foundation, a non-profit that honors journalism in the public interest.
Illustrated cover of Gaza issue. Illustration shows an illustrated representation of Gaza, sohwing crowded buildings surrounded by a wall on three sides. Above the buildings is the sun, with light shining down. Above the sun is a white bird. Text below the city says: All Eyes on Gaza
Get 10 issues for $19.95

Subscribe to the print magazine.