The Working Families Party doesn't field candidates but works to push the Democratic Party to the left by endorsing certain Democrats who share progressive priorities and values. (Rhode Island Working Families Party/ Facebook)

A Progressive Wave Rolls Through Rhode Island With 4 Working Families Party Wins

The winning candidates believed “the Democratic Party wasn’t representing their values.” They were right.

BY Theo Anderson

Email this article to a friend

'These victories create some very real momentum that we can build on.'

The Working Families Party (WFP) of Rhode Island won four key victories in the state’s Democratic primary election this week, defeating conservative incumbents by endorsing candidates who support a $15 minimum wage, paid sick leave for workers, racial and gender equality and other progressive issues.

A teacher from Providence who was born in Jamaica, Marcia Ranglin-Vassell, scored the narrowest and most-surprising upset, defeating House Majority Leader John DeSimone with a platform that emphasized better public education. She won by 17 votes.

“That’s a huge upset—a very big deal,” said Georgia Hollister-Isman, state director for the Rhode Island WFP. DeSimone “was a long-serving and very powerful figure in the House.”

The other WFP-endorsed candidates who won were Jeanine Calkin, Jason Knight and Moira Walsh. Each believed “the Democratic Party wasn't representing their values,” Hollister-Isman said, “and had faith that if they took that directly to the voters, it would get a lot of support. And they were right.”

“These victories create some very real momentum that we can build on,” said Hollister-Isman.

WFP doesn't field candidates but works to push the Democratic Party to the left by endorsing certain Democrats who share progressive priorities and values. An article about it in The Atlantic this year called it “the pugnacious, relentless progressive party that wants to remake America,” noting that the party “has been instrumental in pushing issues such as government-mandated paid sick leave and a $15 minimum wage to the forefront of the national Democratic agenda.”

WFP was founded in the late-1990s and began as a regional party, working to elect progressives in Connecticut, New Jersey and New York. It now has chapters in about a dozen states and in Washington, D.C. In addition to endorsing candidates, it supports them by helping to build their ground games and get-out-the-vote operations.

“I could not have done it without the Working Families Party,” said Knight, who is seeking to represent District 67 in Rhode Island’s House of Representatives. Knight served in the Navy from 1988 to 1996 and is now a criminal defense attorney.

Knight said he entered the race—his first political campaign—to help disrupt and reform the Democratic Party machine that controls the state's politics.

“When I entered the (military) service, I did it primarily out of a sense of duty to the community I live in, with the idea of giving back,” Knight said. “And when I decided to run this spring, the impulse came from basically the same place.

“We have a real problem with a perception of corruption. One of the perceptions in this state is that you have to know a guy to get things done. And I want to battle against that. I want to strive for a high level of transparency and openness, and encourage other people to do the same,” said Knight.

Walsh, who works as a restaurant waitress, decided to run after taking part in a successful campaign to raise the minimum hourly wage for tip workers. It had been $2.89 since 1996. The Rhode Island legislature voted to raise it by $1 over two years, in spite of a strong business lobby.

“I realized how much fun it was making people do the right thing even when they didn't want to,” Walsh said. “There was something really satisfying about hearing all these excuses from legislators as to why we couldn't do it, until they didn't have any other option but to say yes.  And I realized I wanted a more central way to make a difference.”

Walsh will run unopposed in House District 3 in the general election in November.

As a non-profit, independent publication, In These Times relies on financial support from readers to keep the lights on and our reporters on the beat, covering the critical stories of our time. This year, we need to raise an additional $35,000 online from readers like you by December 31.

We try not to ask too often, but this is one of those times that we must. So please, if you want to continue reading In These Times now and into the future, make a tax-deductible donation today.

Theo Anderson, an In These Times writing fellow, has contributed to the magazine since 2010. He has a Ph.D. in modern U.S. history from Yale and writes on the intellectual and religious history of conservatism and progressivism in the United States. Follow him on Twitter @Theoanderson7 and contact him at [email protected]

View Comments