Good article, I thought. That the Bush administration seems to want to return to the philosophy of the disastrous “Freedom to Farm Act” says a lot about their general lack of judgement and their inability to learn from experience.
Overall, a good use of the chicken industry as an example, but I think that the interest of major chicken players in low grain prices is somewhat overstated. Because there are so few major players, and because they do not sell “chickens on the hoof”, higher grain prices are very easily passed on to the consumer, leaving their profits untouched. It seems to me that the consumer bears the brunt of higher grain prices, in a myriad of food products. So saying that the farm subsidies go instead to corporate players would be also overstated. Still, current farm subsidies that are almost totally divorced from production limits or need do contribute to lower grain market prices.
Posted by JPetersmith on Jun 4, 2007 at 1:04 PM
Also by David Moberg
Illinois unions faced a hazardous field of candidates in Illinois’ primary election contests on Tuesday, and most...
- Our Neoliberal President
- The Rise of the Digital Proletariat
- Why the GOP Really Fears Minimum-Wage Hikes
- Toppling the Tea Party
- Ten Governors’ Races To Watch In 2014
- Sipping Lattes on the Edge of a Volcano
- Mad Men, Season 7, Episode 2: Nasty Bitter Career Gals
- What Europe Can Learn from Ukraine
- How 250 UPS Workers Fired for a Wildcat Strike Won Back Their Jobs
- Kaplan Teachers Win Contract, Proving For-Profit Ed Can Be Unionized