In These Times    
Independent News and Views
HomeAbout UsSubscribeArchivesProject Censored
   
Search The Site
Advanced Search

Features

The 2000 election must not be forgotten.
 
Democracy Now
The world needs more ballots, not more bullets.
 
Cracks in the Coalition
The rest of the world begins to sour on the war.
 
Abortion Under Attack
Chipping away at the right to choose.
 
But Venezuela's "revolution" faces many obstacles.
 

Views

Selling the War.
 
Kamikaze Capitalists.
 
 

News

The IRA moves forward with decommissioning—but some loyalists don't want peace.
 
New Yorkers elect Bloomberg as their next mayor.
 
There's a Police Riot Goin' On
Anti-war marchers feel the chill in Connecticut.
 
Climate of Fear
Long Island activist is charged as a "terrorist."
 
In Person
Fred Korematsu made a federal case out of it.
 

Culture

MUSIC: No joy for New Order.
 
The Vagina that Roared
BOOKS: Susanna Kaysen's "sore spot."
 
Fille, Interrupted
FILM: Fat Girl and French Feminism.
 
Mind out of Time
The seven ages of Bob.
 

 
November 9, 2001
Kamikaze Capitalists
No Logo

hat do you call someone who believes so firmly in the promise of salvation through a set of rigid rules that he is willing to risk his own life to spread those rules? A religious fanatic? A holy warrior?

How about a U.S. trade negotiator.

On November 5, the World Trade Organization began its meeting in Doha, Qatar. According to U.S. security briefings, there is reason to believe that al-Qaeda, which has plenty of supporters in the Gulf state, has managed to get some of its operatives into the country, including an explosives specialist. Some terrorists may even have managed to infiltrate the Qatari military.

Given these threats, you might expect the United States and WTO to have canceled their meetings. But not these true believers. Instead, U.S. delegates have been kitted out with gas masks, two-way radios and drugs to combat bioterrorism. As negotiators wrangle over agricultural subsidies, softwood lumber and pharmaceutical patents, helicopters will be waiting to whisk U.S. delegates onto aircraft carriers parked in the Persian Gulf, ready for a Batman-style getaway.

U.S. Trade Representative Robert Zoellick has praised his delegation for being willing to “sacrifice” in the face of such “undoubted risks.” Why are they doing it? Probably for the same reason people have always put their lives on the line for a cause: They believe in a set of rules that promises transcendence. Call it Kamikaze Capitalism.

In this case, the god is economic growth, and it promises to save us from global recession. New markets to access, new sectors to privatize, new regulations to slash—these will get those arrows in the corner of our television screens pointing heavenward once again.

Of course, growth cannot be created at a meeting, but Doha can accomplish something else, something more religious than economic. It can send “a sign” to the market, a sign that growth is on the way and expansion is just around the corner. An ambitious new round of WTO negotiations is the sign they are praying for. In rich countries like ours, the desire for this sign is desperate. It is more pressing than any possible problems with current WTO rules, problems mostly raised by poor countries, fed up with a system that has pushed them to drop their trade barriers while rich countries kept theirs up.

So it’s no surprise that poor countries are this round’s strongest opponents. Before they agree to drastically expand the reach of the WTO, many are asking rich countries to make good on their promises from the last round. There are major disputes swirling around tariffs on garments and the patenting of life forms.

The most contentious issue is drug patents: India, Brazil, Thailand and a coalition of African countries want clear language stating that patents can be overridden to protect public health. The United States and Canada are not just resisting—they are resisting even as their own delegates head for Qatar popping discount Cipro, muscled out of Bayer using exactly the kind of pressure tactics they are calling unfair trade practices.

These concerns are not reflected in the draft ministerial declaration, which is why Nigeria has blasted the WTO for being “one-sided” and “disregarding the concerns of the developing and least developed countries.” India’s WTO ambassador says that the draft “gives the uncomfortable impression that there is no serious attempt to bring issues of importance to developing countries into the mainstream.”

These protests have made little impression in Geneva. Growth is the only god at these negotiations, and any measures that could slow profits even slightly—of drug companies, of water companies, of oil companies—are being treated by believers as if they are on the side of the infidels and evildoers.

We are witnessing trade being “bundled” (Microsoft-style) inside the with-us-or-against-us logic of the war on terrorism. “By promoting the WTO’s agenda,” Zoellick explains, “these 142 nations can counter the revulsive destructionism of terrorism.” Open markets, he says, are “an antidote” to the terrorists’ “violent rejectionism.” (Fittingly, these are non-arguments glued together with made-up words.)

Zoellick has called on WTO member states to set aside their petty concerns about mass poverty and AIDS and to join the economic front of America’s war. “We hope the representatives who meet in Doha will perceive the larger stakes,” he says.
Trade negotiations are all about power and opportunity, and for Doha’s Kamikaze Capitalists, terrorism is just another opportunity to leverage. Perhaps their motto can be: What doesn’t kill us will make us stronger. Much stronger.

Naomi Klein, whose new column will be appearing in the magazine regularly, can be reached at www.nologo.org.





2002 The Institute for Public Affairs | Contact webmaster.
home | about us | subscribe | archives | project censored