The Biggest Lesson from Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Win? Run on Democratic Socialism.
The 28-year-old Latina scored the biggest upset of 2018 by rejecting Democratic Party orthodoxy and running on a laser-focused message of economic justice. If other candidates want to win, they should follow her lead.
On Tuesday morning, just hours after unseating one of the most powerful Democrats in U.S. Congress, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez gave an interview on MSNBC’s Morning Joe in which she offered a succinct, yet compelling, rundown of her insurgent campaign’s “laser-focused” message:
“Economic, social and racial dignity for working-class Americans, especially those in Queens and the Bronx. We were very clear about our message, we were very clear about our priorities and very clear about the fact that, even if you’ve never voted before, we are talking to you.”
Clocking in just around 16 seconds, Ocasio-Cortez, a 28-year-old democratic socialist, was able to articulate a clearer and more captivating message than the entirety of the Democratic Party establishment could come up with over the course of the 2016 election. Host Mika Brzezinski acknowledged how refreshing it was to hear a Democrat speak in such straightforward terms, yet warned other candidates not to “steal her message” and to come up with their own.
However, if Democrats want to win in 2018 and beyond, then cribbing from what Ocasio-Cortez ran on in New York’s 14th District is exactly what they should be doing.
Her campaign essentially rewrote the rules of Democratic Party politics, tossing out the window the previously accepted orthodoxy that big money is the path to victory, and that outspoken socialists are too far left to win election to the U.S. Congress. And as a millennial, working-class Puerto Rican woman from the Bronx, Ocasio-Cortez proved that, in 2018, challengers from the most unlikely backgrounds are capable of toppling entrenched, machine-backed Democrats.
Her opponent, Rep. Joe Crowley, was an embodiment of a career politician, having been handed his seat in 1998 by a predecessor and for years serving as a party boss detached from the communities he was elected to represent.
He outraised Ocasio-Cortez 10-to‑1, spending more than $3 million on the race, much of which came from big banks and tech giants. He had the support of dozens of elected officials including New York Sen. Chuck Schumer and Gov. Andrew Cuomo. He was seen as a contender to become the next Speaker of the House. And yet he was drubbed, losing 57 – 42 to an avowed democratic socialist who had never before run for office.
So what can other candidates learn from Ocasio-Cortez’s shocking victory?
First off, rather than offering tepid, weak tea solutions to the torrent of crises facing working-class families, as has been many Democrats’ preferred strategy, Ocasio-Cortez veered left, putting forward transformational proposals built out of movement demands: Medicare for all, a federal jobs guarantee, a Green New Deal, a Marshall Plan for Puerto Rico, the human right to housing, an end to for-profit incarceration, free public college, demilitarizing the police and abolishing ICE.
As a candidate propelled by social movements — and backed by such groups as the Justice Democrats, Our Revolution and the Democratic Socialists of America — she was able to attract an army of volunteers who helped make her improbable win a reality through their tireless efforts.
And movements didn’t just jump on board her campaign — Ocasio-Cortez was already an organizer and activist with roots in movement politics. She was initially recruited by Brand New Congress to jump in the race after returning from an encampment at Standing Rock in late 2016, where she was demonstrating to protect Native rights and stop the Dakota Access Pipeline
On Sunday, two days before the election, Ocasio-Cortez was not campaigning in New York but instead at a border checkpoint in Texas, protesting the inhumane detention of immigrant families by the Trump administration.
Her unwavering advocacy for immigrant rights led to her early call to abolish ICE, once a fringe position that has been gaining traction among Democratic representatives and candidates in recent weeks. With reports of immigration officials separating thousands of families, attacking and detaining attorneys and beating and drugging innocent children, the public’s moral outrage has translated into political momentum to defund and dismantle ICE, an agency that’s sole purpose is to make life more horrid for those who attempt to enter the United States.
On Monday, Rep. Mark Pocan (D‑Wisc.) announced he will be introducing a bill in the House to abolish ICE, which Ocasio-Cortez will soon be able to sign on to as the expected next representative from New York’s 14th District.
Ocasio-Cortez is also a former organizer for Bernie Sanders, having mobilized his presidential campaign in New York City. In 2016, Sanders demonstrated how to mount a candidacy around making ambitious demands outside of the Overton window — and many of the policies he ran on now also make up Ocasio-Cortez’s platform.
Regardless of how Sanders is viewed by the Democratic establishment, it’s difficult to argue with the fact that the policies he’s long championed, from single-payer healthcare to free college, are now becoming mainstream in the party. Ocasio-Cortez has now shown that an even more visionary set of policies is capable of winning a high-profile Democratic Congressional primary over a 10-term incumbent.
Since his presidential run, Sanders has been criticized for putting too much focus on class issues over those of racial injustice. In her campaign, Ocasio-Cortez deftly illustrated that this has always been a false binary, explaining to the Nation: “I can’t name a single issue with roots in race that doesn’t have economic implications, and I cannot think of a single economic issue that doesn’t have racial implications. The idea that we have to separate them out and choose one is a con.”
And on the issue of socialism, Ocasio-Cortez has not shied away from embracing the label, explaining it as an ideology based upon equality and democracy. By connecting her core campaign message to these basic tenets, she was able to provide a persuasive expression of socialism to voters, grounded in moral clarity.
“To me, what socialism means is to guarantee a basic level of dignity,” she told Vogue. “It’s asserting the value of saying that the America we want and America we are proud of is one in which all children can access a dignified education. It’s one in which no person is too poor to have the medicines they need to live.
“It’s to say that no individual’s civil rights are to be violated. And it’s to say that we need to really examine the historical inequities that have created much of the inequalities — both in terms of economics and social and racial justice — because they are intertwined.”
It’s no overstatement to say that Ocasio-Cortez has upended the Democratic Party. Her victory — along with wins by other left challengers in Tuesday’s primaries, including Ben Jealous in Maryland and Emily Sirota in Colorado — shows that the energy in the party lies squarely with its left wing.
By challenging the power of Wall Street and corporations, and refusing to accept any corporate PAC money, Ocasio-Cortez was able to run a campaign that took on the big money interests that dominate both major parties. She showed that voters respond when they’re given the option to support a candidate who speaks for them and targets concentrated economic power as the root cause of many of the issues facing them in their daily lives. Rather than simply converting traditional voters in the district, her campaign effectively reached out to and energized a new swath of the electorate. And she was rewarded at the ballot box.
The day following her victory brought a new litany of horrors, from the Supreme Court’s monumental anti-union Janus decision to the announcement that Justice Anthony Kennedy plans to retire, threatening the future of abortion access, affirmative action and many other critical protections on which Americans rely.
Meanwhile, according to the New York Times, Democrats “appeared helpless” to stop this right-wing assault. After decades of tacking center and embracing neoliberalism as the core principle guiding its political vision, the Democratic establishment seems to have little to offer working Americans sick of a bankrupt status quo. On Wednesday, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi responded to the shock result in New York by refuting suggestions that socialist politics are ascendant in the Democratic Party, saying: “No. They’re not.”
But if the party hopes to mount a credible challenge to Trump and the GOP, take back Congress in 2018 and actually shift the direction of our politics to benefit working people, the path forward is being blazed by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
Democratic candidates don’t have to steal her message. But if they want to win, it’s the best place to start.
Many nonprofits have seen a big dip in support in the first part of 2021, and here at In These Times, donation income has fallen by more than 20% compared to last year. For a lean publication like ours, a drop in support like that is a big deal.
After everything that happened in 2020, we don't blame anyone for wanting to take a break from the news. But the underlying causes of the overlapping crises that occurred last year remain, and we are not out of the woods yet. The good news is that progressive media is now more influential and important than ever—but we have a very small window to make change.
At a moment when so much is at stake, having access to independent, informed political journalism is critical. To help get In These Times back on track, we’ve set a goal to bring in 500 new donors by July 31. Will you be one of them?
Miles Kampf-Lassin, a graduate of New York University’s Gallatin School in Deliberative Democracy and Globalization, is a Web Editor at In These Times. Follow him on Twitter @MilesKLassin