Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, captures the attention of U.S. citizens far less than it should, considering that its byproducts include carcinogens that make their way into drinking water and cause air pollution. The practice is pervasive, due in part to the “Halliburton Loophole,” which, according to Don Lieber’s PlanetSave.com article “Fracking Waste: Too Toxic, Even for A Hazardous Waste Site,” gets the natural gas industry out of a slew of regulatory and reporting requirements in the Safe Drinking Water Act. We can thank former Vice President Dick Cheney for that loophole.
Lieber writes about a truck carrying fracking waste that was turned away from a Pennsylvania toxic waste dump because its levels of radioactive, cancer-causing Radium-226 were too dangerous. Despite such roadblocks, Lieber says, ”the natural gas boom’ proceeds”:
The natural gas industry has also played an active role in suppressing public knowledge about the health risks of the chemicals they routinely use — including lobbying successfully to ban doctors from freely discussing with their patients the links between symptoms and the chemicals used in nearby fracking operations.
The New England Journal of Medicine last year accused the natural gas industry of ”infringing on the doctor-patient relationship.”
Rice Energy, the operator of the fracking site in Greene County, operates 59 fracking wells throughout Pennsylvania.
Not to be deterred by the rejection of its highly radioactive, carcinogenic waste by-product, however, the company is applying for a new permit to allow the disposal of more radioactive materials in Pennsylvania, according to Forbes.
Read the rest at PlanetSave.com.
Please consider supporting our work.
I hope you found this article important. Before you leave, I want to ask you to consider supporting our work with a donation. In These Times needs readers like you to help sustain our mission. We don’t depend on—or want—corporate advertising or deep-pocketed billionaires to fund our journalism. We’re supported by you, the reader, so we can focus on covering the issues that matter most to the progressive movement without fear or compromise.
Our work isn’t hidden behind a paywall because of people like you who support our journalism. We want to keep it that way. If you value the work we do and the movements we cover, please consider donating to In These Times.
