Over at TomPaine, E.J. Graff is a good start to a morning of Roberts-mania with her analysis of what role Supreme Court decisions play in social and cultural debates:
The Supreme Court is one power outlet among many in our nation's public policy electricity grid. If Roberts tilts the court further to the right, progressive advocates will just have to find other ways to win.
Few non-lawyers realize that, for more than two hundred years, the court has constantly been shifting its job description. … always they are in intimate conversation with their era, batting beliefs back and forth with the Congress, the president, the media, organizations and the general public climate. And not one of them has had the final say.
Several bloggers have picked up on my first thought, that the timing of this announcement nicely supplants Karl Rove in the headlines. The Village Voice was on it yesterday:
Of course, in information warfare, timing is everything, and the Bush White House is a synchronized machine. No surprise, then, that the name of the Supreme Court nominee is going out in prime time tonight. What better way to get the Karl Rove story off the top of the news broadcasts or the front pages of tomorrow's papers.
As for a concise summing up of the nominee, try Robert W. Gordon's over at TalkingPointsMemo Cafe. Ah, Roberts is an institutional player.
But the Chicago Tribune really wraps it up nicely for me, with this sidebar on his positions, particularly this one: MILITARY TRIBUNALS: Roberts was part of a unanimous decision last week that allowed the Pentagon to proceed with plans to use military tribunals to try terrorism suspects held at Guantanamo Bay.
Look, even his kid seems a little freaked out.
Please consider supporting our work.
I hope you found this article important. Before you leave, I want to ask you to consider supporting our work with a donation. In These Times needs readers like you to help sustain our mission. We don’t depend on—or want—corporate advertising or deep-pocketed billionaires to fund our journalism. We’re supported by you, the reader, so we can focus on covering the issues that matter most to the progressive movement without fear or compromise.
Our work isn’t hidden behind a paywall because of people like you who support our journalism. We want to keep it that way. If you value the work we do and the movements we cover, please consider donating to In These Times.
Phoebe Connelly, a former managing editor at In These Times, is Web Editor at The American Prospect.
