2011 has barely begun, but it’s already been a particularly bad year for organized labor in America, as newly-elected GOP governors argue that collective bargaining rights must be curtailed to cope with states’ fiscal crises.
On Thursday, In These Times Senior Editor David Moberg appeared on Chicago Newsroom (broadcast by Chicago Area Network TV) to discuss the multi-front fight by unionists to defend the status quo. The show’s host, Ken Davis — former program director of WBEZ (Chicago public) radio — decided to gather a “brain trust” to understand exactly why public-sector workers have been recast as greedy and overprotected unionists unwilling to sacrifice for the good of the country.
“Part of the problem is that people aren’t willing to face up to what they need from the public sector,” says Moberg. “Their lives would be much worse without the public sector… a lot appreciate the things that are done, from police to firefighters to people who handle drivers licenses. …But it’s something that they don’t expect to pay for.”
The problem, argues Moberg (who has covered the labor movement for the magazine since its founding in 1976) is that “the vast majority” of all of the new income generated during the last few decades has been at the top, and America’s tax system “doesn’t capture where the money is” to keep government working.
Moberg was joined by NPR reporter David Schaper and Bob Bruno, Professor, School of Labor Employment Relations at the University of Illinois.
The conversation focuses in part on Chicago, a city facing a serious budget shortfall. Many of the city’s biggest unions didn’t endorse Mayor-elect Rahm Emanuel, who has said that major budget cuts will be necessary. Davis asks: Will the former White House chief of staff become Chicago’s Scott Walker?
I hope you found this article important. Before you leave, I want to ask you to consider supporting our work with a donation. In These Times needs readers like you to help sustain our mission. We don’t depend on—or want—corporate advertising or deep-pocketed billionaires to fund our journalism. We’re supported by you, the reader, so we can focus on covering the issues that matter most to the progressive movement without fear or compromise.
Our work isn’t hidden behind a paywall because of people like you who support our journalism. We want to keep it that way. If you value the work we do and the movements we cover, please consider donating to In These Times.
Jeremy Gantz is an In These Times contributing editor working at Time magazine.
