The Supreme Court has announced it will be taking up a case concerning the Second Amendment. This is the one where a Federal Appeals Court struck down Washington D.C.'s thirty year old law prohibiting the ownership of handguns within city limits. The decision was appealed and I can imagine certain members of the Court fell over themselves to scoop it up. For a primer on the Second Amendment and the contentiousness over it, read some Lithwick.
Considering how unabashedly right-wing the Supreme Court has become, I really don't think we need to wonder privately or aloud how this one's gonna play out.
This upcoming election is not just about the next 4-8 years. It is about the health of American law and democracy for the next 50 years. It concerns whether we are to see the total dismantling of almost every progressive legal victory achieved in the last 50 years or if we are to move forward and build upon those achievements. To this writer at least, it is one of the most important factors in my resolve to organize for and vote for whomever becomes the Democratic nominee next year.
Please consider supporting our work.
I hope you found this article important. Before you leave, I want to ask you to consider supporting our work with a donation. In These Times needs readers like you to help sustain our mission. We don’t depend on—or want—corporate advertising or deep-pocketed billionaires to fund our journalism. We’re supported by you, the reader, so we can focus on covering the issues that matter most to the progressive movement without fear or compromise.
Our work isn’t hidden behind a paywall because of people like you who support our journalism. We want to keep it that way. If you value the work we do and the movements we cover, please consider donating to In These Times.
