FISA Debate Back On

Brian Beutler, Media Consortium

In honor of the ongoing FISA debate in the Senate, Attorney General Michael Mukasey and Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell have sent Majority Leader Harry Reid a letter warning him that he better not allow any significant Democratic amendments to mar the Senate Intelligence Committe’s bill, lest the president veto it and, of course, invite a wave of terrorist attacks against the United States. Liability protection is the just result for companies who answered their Government’s call for assistance. Further, it will ensure that the Government can continue to rely upon the assistance of the private sector that is so necessary to the protection of the Nation…. [A]mendments have been offered to S.2248, however, that would undermine significantly the core authorities and immunity provisions of that bill. After careful study, we have determined that those amendments would result in a final bill that would not provide the intelligence community with the tools it needs to collect effectively foreign intelligence information vital for the security of the Nation. If the President is sent a bill that does not provide the U.S. intelligence agencies the tools they need to protect the nation, the President will veto the bill. Emphasis in the original. Those amendments include, well, just about everything: 1. A Feingold amendment providing that “no communication shall be acquired… if the Government knows before or at the time of acquisition that the communication is to or from a person reasonably believed to be located in the United States.” 2. A Feingold amendment requiring the FISC to authorize surveillance of a foreign target if a “significant purpose” of that surveillance is to acquire information about somebody in the United States. This is the ‘reverse targeting’ amendment. 3. A Feingold amendment to prevent the government from collecting any communication if the government has not certified that the acquisition “is limited to communications to which any party is a specific individual target… who is reasonably believed to be outside the United States”. 4. A Feingold amendment that hands discretion over the use of illegally obtained information to the FISC. 5. A Feingold amendment prohibiting reverse targeting. 6. A Dodd-Feingold amnesty stripping amendment. 7. A Whitehouse-Specter amendment which makes the U.S. government the plaintiff in any case against a telecommunications company ruled by the FISC to have engaged in warrantless wiretapping activities in good faith. 8. A Feinstein amendment to allow the FISC to certify that the Attorney General’s declaration of teleco good faith is indeed valid. Basically, the president really wants to spy on Americans and really does not want anybody to suffer any consequences for any previous illegal spying activities, no matter how minor. For every objectionable amendment, the letter includes the following warning: if this amendment is part of the bill that is presented to the President, we, as well as the President’s other senior advisors, will recommend that he veto the bill. It’s an odd piece of legislation that’s so crucial to our national security that it can not be delayed, but also so optional that it can be vetoed if it doesn’t provide a number of unconstitutional provisions granting the executive branch the power to break the law. The votes on these amendments will be coming down soon. I’ll provide a wrap-up.

Help In These Times Celebrate & Have Your Gift Matched!

In These Times is proud to share that we were recently awarded the 16th Annual Izzy Award from the Park Center for Independent Media at Ithaca College. The Izzy Award goes to an independent outlet, journalist or producer for contributions to culture, politics or journalism created outside traditional corporate structures.

Fellow 2024 Izzy awardees include Trina Reynolds-Tyler and Sarah Conway for their joint investigative series “Missing In Chicago," and journalists Mohammed El-Kurd and Lynzy Billing. The Izzy judges also gave special recognition to Democracy Now! for coverage that documented the destruction wreaked in Gaza and raised Palestinian voices to public awareness.

In These Times is proud to stand alongside our fellow awardees in accepting the 2024 Izzy Award. To help us continue producing award-winning journalism a generous donor has pledged to match any donation, dollar-for-dollar, up to $20,000.

Will you help In These Times celebrate and have your gift matched today? Make a tax-deductible contribution to support independent media.

Democratic Rep. Summer Lee, who at the time was a candidate for the state House, at a demonstration in Pittsburgh for Antwon Rose, who was killed by police, in 2018. Lee recently defeated her 2024 primary challenger.
Get 10 issues for $19.95

Subscribe to the print magazine.