Suburban Chicago handgun bans are being repealed faster than you can say "litigation." Yesterday, Evanston's city council nearly unanimously voted for the repeal, the goal of an NRA lawsuit filed following June's Supreme Court ruling that Washington D.C.'s handgun ban was unconstitutional. Here's Evanston alderman Steve Berstein on the repeal, in today's Chicago Tribune:
"I find the Supreme Court decision repugnant. [But] this city was facing hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal expenses. We'll be better off getting [the ordinance] off the books… We don't want people to have handguns in Evanston, but right now the law is against us. This was pragmatic. We're being sued. It'd be nice to fight for principal but we don't have the money to fight."
Wilmette and Morton Grove have also repealed their handgun bans, although the latter is continuing to ban automatic weapons, grenades and BB guns (!), and Evanston officials say they hope to add restrictions later (when the legal smoke clears, I suppose).
Who does have the money to fight the Supreme Court? Chicago and Oak Park, that's who. Their likely argument? That the Supreme Court's decision only applied to an area under federal jurisdiction (D.C.), and should not apply to state municipalities.
I'm no legal scholar, but Chicago and Oak Park are looking pretty lonely on this.
SPECIAL DEAL: Subscribe to our award-winning print magazine, a publication Bernie Sanders calls "unapologetically on the side of social and economic justice," for just $1 an issue! That means you'll get 10 issues a year for $9.95.
Jeremy Gantz is an In These Times contributing editor working at Time magazine.