Josh Marshall has an excellent analysis about the core ineffectiveness of Sarah Palin's small, "shrill," and nasty little speech last night, (he's got a great title for his piece, too: "Rage We Can Believe In"). Josh is right on about how Palin's speech, while rife with the exact sort of rancor the crowd at the Xcel Center has been lusting after, was not at all attuned to what the electorate at large wants to hear this election cycle. What struck me most about his post, though, was his reference to the fact that the media keeps spinning its wheels chasing after the non-story about Bristol and her baby, (a story McCain's camp is actually encouraging them to chase), and meanwhile is almost totally ignoring the truly alarming rate at which Palin lies about significant issues like pork-barreling, the "Bridge to Nowhere," and the rapidly unfolding "Troopergate" scandal. These are serious stories that call into question her honesty, her character, and her ability to lead. And, again, they completely damn McCain's judgment in choosing her. Let's keep the focuses on the real transgressions, and her troubling views on the issues, as opposed to the tabloid stories, that this political tool from Alaska really brings to the national table.
More articles by Jarrett
Jindal Sitting Down To Sup On The Pork
Jarrett
Former President Bush
Jarrett
MLK Day Lunchtime Links
Jarrett
Announcing In These Times’ New Agreement with the National Writers Union
Freelance contributors are essential to the quality and success of In These Times and independent media, and this agreement is one way to demonstrate their value to our publication and our commitment to transparency.
For more information about the National Writers Union, visit nwu.org.
Read the full agreement, which reaffirms a floor for the rates of our freelance editorial content, as well as our current rates (which are higher) and submissions guidelines below.