New Hampshire was once the site of some of the nation's most contentious battles over "right-to-work" legislation--measures pushed by the GOP that allow workers to receive the benefits of union representation without paying dues.
But now, the clarion calls of Republican state legislators appear to be falling on deaf ears. A crowd of less than 100 showed up to a legislative hearing on a right-to-work measure Wednesday, in contrast to the 2011 hearings that filled the 400 seats in New Hampshire's statehouse. With a newly elected Democratic majority in the state's House of Representatives, the anti-union, wage-killing legislation is likely no longer a threat.
From Nashua's Telegraph:
Mark MacKenzie, president of the New Hampshire AFL-CIO labor union, cited the 2012 study of the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute that concluded a right-to-work law would cause wages to decline by an average $1,500 a year.
“It is beyond any doubt that based on the economic data alone, this bill is bad policy for our state,” MacKenzie said.
For more on right-to-work laws, see the Economic Policy Institute's research .
More articles by Ian Becker
Bangladesh Considers Raising $38/Month Minimum Wage
Ian Becker
Chicago Admits $122 Million Error on School Closure Savings
Ian Becker
‘Torture’ Team Arrives at Gitmo; Obama Reiterates His Vow to Close
Ian Becker
Announcing In These Times’ New Agreement with the National Writers Union
Freelance contributors are essential to the quality and success of In These Times and independent media, and this agreement is one way to demonstrate their value to our publication and our commitment to transparency.
For more information about the National Writers Union, visit nwu.org.
Read the full agreement, which reaffirms a floor for the rates of our freelance editorial content, as well as our current rates (which are higher) and submissions guidelines below.