The Nadir of Nader

Laura S. Washington

He’s back. And he’s got your back.

In a perfect world, there would be room for debate about the role of independent parties. But thanks to Bush, this world is far from perfect.

Yes, Ralph Nader has thrown down that withering, raggedy old gauntlet in one more tiresome bid for the presidency. Our modern-day Don Quixote will mount his high horse, yet again, to announce why he believes he is the only true independent candidate for the White House.

Following Nader’s Feb. 24 announcement that he is running as an independent candidate, the New York Times noted that reactions from the Democratic candidates on Sunday ranged from disdainful to dismissive.”

To say the least.

Nader. The mere mention of that particular n-word gives me the heebie jeebies.

For decades, Nader was a hero to progressives who cherished consumer and environmental rights. He was the advocate extraordinaire, revered for his attacks on cutthroat corporate interests that were stealing the American dream and soiling the environment.

At 74, he has launched four runs for the presidency. That’s at least two too many.

In 2004, he ended up with about 1 percent of the vote.

Nader’s insistence on hogging the electoral limelight in 2000 siphoned off crucial support from Democratic nominee Al Gore and helped sweep in our most disastrous president ever. Can you say Halliburton? The Iraq invasion? No Child Left Behind? The Patriot Act? The attorney general witchhunt? The subprime mess? 

No doubt Gore deserves a good dose of blame. He ran a mediocre and schizophrenic campaign. He shunned the best thing he had going – Bill Clinton. Still, the former vice president went on to tell us some Inconvenient Truths and win a Nobel Peace Prize.

Nader says he’s got your back. He is doing this for you. He says the other candidates are not talking about our bloated” military budget, corporate criminals and the leading political parties’ abuse of the electoral system.

But it’s really all about Ralph, who has emerged after four years in the wilderness to discover that Democrats may have the best shot at complete control of D.C., in a long, long time.

Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), for his part, is not the messiah – despite his cult-like following. Obama, once a solid progressive, is now running at breakneck speed toward the center. At the Feb. 26 debate in Cleveland, he cheerily told voters that he is no liberal. Yet Obama is the only wall between 100 more years in Iraq and economic disaster at home. 

Meanwhile, Nader is trying to hold on to that miniscule pinpoint of limelight and just a few more headlines. 

It’s pathetic.

Yes, maybe I’m mean and unfair. The 2000 election debacle was mean and unfair too, and Nader had a hand in it. Yes, maybe marginalizing Nader goes against the grain of America’s democratic traditions of inclusion and independence. As a progressive, I am generally sympathetic to those arguments. 

But in a perfect world, there would be room for a spirited and substantive debate about the role of independent parties in American politics today. Thanks to George W. Bush, however, this world is far from perfect.

The day after his announcement, Nader appeared on Ron Silver’s daily talk show on Sirius radio. He told Americans that we must remember our history.” The best ideas in American history have come from small parties,” he intoned. Norman Thomas, the Socialist Party, he ran for president five times, he put forth social security, unemployment compensation, the progressive income tax, labor standards … .”

My friend, the late Jim Weinstein, could tell Nader a few things about history. In fact, he did. In 2001, Weinstein, the founder of In These Times and an astute historian of the left, drew a barrage of brickbats with his piece, Let’s Crash the Party (Instead of Throwing Our Own).” 

Revisiting the 2000 debacle, Weinstein wrote that, instead of building a constituency for his ideas, as he claimed to be doing, Nader divided an already existing one and did a terrible disservice to progressives. Clearly, the constituency for Nader’s ideas is much greater than his following. For every person who cast a vote for Nader, there were at least 10 who shared his views on many issues but voted Democratic.”

Nader created a gulf among progressives that led his followers up a blind alley, where they may be lost for some time to come.”

Jim was so right then – and now. 

Nader, get lost.

Help In These Times Celebrate & Have Your Gift Matched!

In These Times is proud to share that we were recently awarded the 16th Annual Izzy Award from the Park Center for Independent Media at Ithaca College. The Izzy Award goes to an independent outlet, journalist or producer for contributions to culture, politics or journalism created outside traditional corporate structures.

Fellow 2024 Izzy awardees include Trina Reynolds-Tyler and Sarah Conway for their joint investigative series “Missing In Chicago," and journalists Mohammed El-Kurd and Lynzy Billing. The Izzy judges also gave special recognition to Democracy Now! for coverage that documented the destruction wreaked in Gaza and raised Palestinian voices to public awareness.

In These Times is proud to stand alongside our fellow awardees in accepting the 2024 Izzy Award. To help us continue producing award-winning journalism a generous donor has pledged to match any donation, dollar-for-dollar, up to $20,000.

Will you help In These Times celebrate and have your gift matched today? Make a tax-deductible contribution to support independent media.

Laura S. Washington, an In These Times contributing editor, is a columnist for the Chicago Sun-Times and political analyst for ABC 7-Chicago.
Democratic Rep. Summer Lee, who at the time was a candidate for the state House, at a demonstration in Pittsburgh for Antwon Rose, who was killed by police, in 2018. Lee recently defeated her 2024 primary challenger.
Get 10 issues for $19.95

Subscribe to the print magazine.