Women. That sought after bloc.

Phoebe Connelly

Ok. So we're back to discussing women as a key voting bloc in this fall election: "What Women Voters Want" But what is eerie about this editorial, published in this Sunday's New York Times is not that it considers this "swing" constituency, or even candidates' late efforts to address it, but that it champions Bush's successful recasting of his political message in ???a way that appeals to women??? as a some sort of victory for women as voters. To be sure, the president did not erase Mr. Kerry's lead among women with one speech. Yet Mr. Bush's speech was the culmination of a studied, nuanced effort to alter the Republican message to women, and - perhaps more significant - to overhaul the approach of the party in reaching out to the majority of voters. It's a revision of strategy, and a reversal of fortune, that deserves greater attention. In this presidential election, it is becoming more and more clear that the female voter is the true swing voter. Isn't it more than a little insulting to women as a whole that all that needs altering in Bush's strategy is the language? After all, as Molly Ivins points out in the most recent Mother Jones: Even after four years in office, George W. Bush???s record on women doesn???t leap out at you. It???s composed almost entirely of little things, small enough to fly well under the media???s radar screen, so few of us have any sense of their cumulative impact. But when you step back, the pattern emerges, and it is large, ugly, and unmistakable. Behind a smoke screen of high-profile female appointees and soothing slogans, George W. Bush is waging war on women. Right. So perhaps we could go back to Bush???s position in regards to issues and not just ???his building an emotional connection, humanizing himself and portraying himself as the candidate who can keep America safe????

For a limited time:

Donate $20 or more to In These Times and we'll send you a copy of Let This Radicalize You.

In this new book, longtime organizers and movement educators Mariame Kaba and Kelly Hayes examine the political lessons of the Covid-19 pandemic and its aftermath, including the convergence of mass protest and mass formations of mutual aid. Let This Radicalize You answers the urgent question: What fuels and sustains activism and organizing when it feels like our worlds are collapsing?

We've partnered with the publisher, Haymarket Books, and 100% of your donation will go towards supporting In These Times.

Phoebe Connelly, a former managing editor at In These Times, is Web Editor at The American Prospect.
Get 10 issues for $19.95

Subscribe to the print magazine.