In These Times is committed to remaining fiercely independent, but we need your help. Donate now to make sure we can continue providing the original reporting, deep investigation, and strategic analysis needed in this moment. We're proud to be in this together.
Page Not FoundWe need to be united in the fight against fascism and repression.
In These Times is committed to remaining fiercely independent, but we need your help. Donate now to make sure we can continue providing the original reporting, deep investigation, and strategic analysis needed in this moment. We're proud to be in this together. |
||||
Page Not FoundWe need to be united in the fight against fascism and repression.
In These Times is committed to remaining fiercely independent, but we need your help. Donate now to make sure we can continue providing the original reporting, deep investigation, and strategic analysis needed in this moment. We're proud to be in this together. |
||||
Page Not FoundWe need to be united in the fight against fascism and repression.
In These Times is committed to remaining fiercely independent, but we need your help. Donate now to make sure we can continue providing the original reporting, deep investigation, and strategic analysis needed in this moment. We're proud to be in this together. |
||||
Page Not FoundWe need to be united in the fight against fascism and repression.
In These Times is committed to remaining fiercely independent, but we need your help. Donate now to make sure we can continue providing the original reporting, deep investigation, and strategic analysis needed in this moment. We're proud to be in this together.
Experimental medical research on inmates is on the rise.
What Bush should have learned from the Cold War.
Inside Ashcroft's police state.
The AFL-CIO regroups.
Racism on Trial
Affirmative action on the ropes.
Editorial
Creeping Authoritarianism.
Appall-o-Meter
England moves to decriminalize narcotics.
Back in the U.S.S.R?
No, but former Communists are retaking power in Eastern Europe.
Immigrant Exodus
Mexicans head south of the border.
Death threats and plant closings threaten workers rights in Guatemala.
Pearl Watson: A Woman, A Plan, A Canal.
Self Reliance
BOOKS: Vivian Gornick's political struggle.
2G or not 2G?
BOOKS: Stories of The Holocaust Kid.
FILM: The Royal Tenenbaums, Lord of the Rings, Ocean's Eleven.
The clubs were alive with the sound of John's sax ...
|
December 7, 2001
Maquila Melée
Death threats and plant closings threaten workers rights
in Guatemala.
Just days after a year-long organizing campaign went public at two textile
factories outside Guatemala City in July, union supporters were violently attacked
and injured at work by a mob wielding rocks, bottles and other makeshift weapons
in an assault that lasted for hours. Union leaders who pleaded for help from the Korean management were told there
was nothing they could do. In fact, union leaders charge that the managers themselves
instigated the attack, pitting worker against worker with threats that if the
union campaign succeeded, the factory would be closed and the employees blacklisted
from ever getting work again. Minutes before the melée, workers reported
hearing a supervisor say, “Today we’ll see who wins. It’s either
us or them.” By the end of the day, 10 union leaders had been forced to
resign; the July 18 attack ended only after the arrival of union, human rights
and labor ministry representatives at the scene. Paid between $150 and $180 a month—with many spending more than a quarter
of their wages on potable water that’s sporadically trucked into the nearby
shantytowns—the 1,200 workers at the Choishin and Cimatextiles corporate
factories sew clothes that eventually bear the Liz Claiborne label. In 1998,
after two years of negotiations with a local monitoring agency, Liz Claiborne
took the rare step of allowing the independent monitoring of some plants and
agreed that the agency’s findings be made public. Following the violent
July 18 attack, Liz Claiborne sent a letter to union leaders in support of the
right to organize, an unprecedented response by a major corporation. But despite Liz Claiborne’s support, and the managers’ signed agreement
to recognize the union, workers face continued threats, harassment and intimidation.
One union leader says he wakes to find his house watched in the middle of the
night. Other union supporters are followed home and receive threatening phone
calls, even death threats. More recently, union supporters have faced more subtle
forms of intimidation, such as being moved to work stations with faulty and
aged machinery, thus decreasing their ability to meet work quotas and receive
full pay. Obstacles to organizing workers in Guatemala are not limited to the apparel
industry. Across the board, Guate-malan union leaders come up against daunting
barriers: brutal harassment from employers, a government that, at best, turns
its back to blatant violations of labor rights, and workers terrified of joining
unions for fear they’ll lose their jobs or even their lives. Since 1954, when a U.S.-backed coup launched 36 years of bloody dictatorships
and civil war—which saw Guatemalan union leaders brutally murdered and
unions crushed—union membership, between 1 and 2 percent, has remained
the lowest in Central America. In the mid-’90s, the government signed peace
accords ending the internal conflict, a process still monitored by the United
Nations, but workers in textile plants and agriculture regularly face violence
when trying to organize. Since the peace accords were signed, the only successful
union campaign at an apparel-export factory, Phillips van Heusen, was crushed
after workers won a contract and the plant closed in 1998. With 27 apparel plants closing between January and August 2001, union supporters
at the Guate-malan maquiladoras, more than half of which are Korean-owned,
know the threats are real. Guatemala instituted a new labor code in May under pressure from the United
States, which threatened to end Guate-mala’s favorable trading status if
the country did not improve workers rights. Although the new code fell far short
of the standards set by the International Labor Organization, and even those
sought by the United States, Washington dropped its threats after the bill’s
passage. The AFL-CIO, with the support of Guatemalan trade unions, has asked
the United States to renew pressure on the Guatemalan government in the wake
of the attacks on the Choishin and Cimatextiles workers. The code was passed as military control—and paramilitary violence—is
escalating. “The current government has a policy of harassment and intimidation—very
direct physical harassment,” says Frank La Rue, director of the Guatemalan-based
Center for Legal and Human Rights. By May 2001, he notes, “every single
non-governmental organization” monitoring human and workers rights had
been “broken into or threatened” in the previous six months. The campaign at the Choishin and Cimatextiles factories would make the two
plants the only maquilas in the country where workers are covered by
a union contract. But as Guatemalan workers struggle to gain basic rights at
the workplace despite increased government repression and a weakened labor code,
the prospects don’t seem good. “We’re actually going backward
in terms of labor rights in Central America,” says Charles Kernaghan, executive
director of the National Labor Committee, a U.S.-based human and workers rights
organization. “We’ve seen wages drop so low they’re almost off
the map.” The situation in Guatemala shows clearly why linking workers rights to international
trade is essential, says Lance Compa, a professor at Cornell University’s
School of Industrial and Labor Relations. “Social justice is not a by-product
of economic growth,” Compa says. “It has to be built into the international
trade system with strong workers rights provisions and tough sanctions against
companies and governments that abuse workers. And one aspect of that is international
trade agreements that include workers rights.” Tula Connell is editor of the AFL-CIO magazine America@Work. |
|||
In These Times is committed to remaining fiercely independent, but we need your help. Donate now to make sure we can continue providing the original reporting, deep investigation, and strategic analysis needed in this moment. We're proud to be in this together.
