|  | ||
|  | ||
|  | ||
| 
 
 An interview with RAWAs Sahar Saba. Thousands of U.S. troops are headed to Central Asia, and they're not leaving anytime soon. Give Us 0.01 Percent Its time for the Tobin tax. Pedal Revolution LOCAL MOTION: New York rediscovers the virtues of car-free public space. Web Exclusive | Greens or Green (Egalitarian) Democrats?
 A Commentary on the Nader 2000 Campaign. 
 Editorial Stand Up for Peace. The West Wings workaholics No Logo IMF: This time it's personal. Appall-o-Meter 
 Amnesty International targets INS for treatment of 9/11 detainees. Half Measures NGOs reject U.N. Monterrey Consensus. Plan Colombia, globalization stir unrest in Ecuador. House Arrest Indigenous organizers jailed in Baja California. Political Prisoners In Person: The Angola Three. BellyWashers Vitamin C Drink. 
 Cuba Confidential BOOKS: Cuban literature is back ... and looking for answers. BOOKS: Mark Nesbitts short but Gigantic stories. FILM: Taking Time Out from work, identity and reality. Walking the Talk The living legacy of the radical past. 
 | March 1, 2002 The West Wings Workaholics   
 The show has been something of a phenomenon in this age of niche marketing 
  and defections to cable channels: a network program not about teenagers routinely 
  ranked in the top 10, right behind Friends and E.R. Winner of multiple Emmy 
  and Golden Globe awards, The West Wing is one of those shows that prompts appointment 
  viewing: Fans carve out time for it every week and are loath to miss it. Why 
  is this showwhich is, after all, about politics and public policy and 
  not mud wrestling or eating live scorpionssuch a hit? Quick answers include great writing, great acting and the desire to pretend, 
  if for only one hour a week, that the White House is not filled with ignorant, 
  mean-spirited, moronic, war-mongering lackeys of corporate America. And this 
  might, in and of itself, probably be enough. Yes, there were those awful moments 
  at the end of the show, especially in the first and second seasons, when the 
  patriotic music soared and someoneusually President Bartletrhapsodized 
  about the beauty of the Bill of Rights and the vast wisdom of the American political 
  process. But even this we were willing to swallow in exchange for the conceit 
  that the president was an expert in 17th-century cartography. It didnt 
  hurt that the show routinely attacked the religious right, the NRA, Dr. Laura 
  and the tobacco industry. But I think the show also speaks powerfully to people whose leisure time continues 
  to shrink, people who live, day-in and day-out, with speed-up at work. The West 
  Wing absolutely celebrates, fetishizes, if you will, workaholism. Overwork is 
  made to seem exciting and glamorous. Watch the way the camera moves. People 
  in the West Wingbecause theyre so importantare always walking 
  at a brisk pace up and down the halls, in and out of offices, in groups of at 
  least two, and the tracking cameras virtually jog to keep up with them. Doors 
  swing open and shut. Phones ring constantly in the background, just above the 
  general din of important-sounding work.  Unlike the multi-tasking we grunts are stuck withchained to our desks, 
  often alone, reading e-mail while listening to voice mail and on hold with automated 
  phone information centersthis West Wing work happens in motion, on the 
  fly: Its almost breathless. The pace and editing alone confirm that working 
  constantly is enviable and thrilling. The shows dialogue gives new meaning to the term snappy patter. These 
  people dont just talk a mile a minute, peppering each other with policy 
  positions, quotations and statistics. Theyre witty, too, as if Lettermans 
  writing staff was feeding them one-liners through an earphone. This too glamorizes 
  the work of political insiders. Their unflagging agility at verbal jousting 
  and affectionate, rapid-fire insults implies intellectual quickness and a deep 
  camaraderie with their colleagues (two things that may be lacking in your own 
  place of employment). When Josh cant answer a series of questions Mandy puts to him, she asks 
  with mock condescension, What is it you do here, exactly? Its never been made clear to me, he retorts. Theres a fire in Yellowstone Park, Sam tells Josh as they 
  rush down a hall.  So put it out, Josh deadpans.  Josh walks into work early one morning to discover his assistant Donna working. 
  Were you here all night? he asks. Is it daytime? she shoots back. Usually when Im up 
  all night, Im able to pass a 19th-century English literature midterm. During the commercial breaks, we see ads for companies like Pacific Life. They 
  are silent and repeatedly show the word performance while we see 
  athletes jumping or diving, intercut with whales surfacing and diving. Individual 
  drive, determination, discipline, thats what leads to success. And thats 
  the message being sold to us by The West Wing and its sponsors. Now, given the right-wing takeover of almost all public-affairs programming 
  on the tube, I am indeed grateful for a show in which liberal (occasionally 
  even progressive) politics seem utterly reasonable, and usually superior to 
  conservatism. Its also refreshing, given the rampant anti-intellectualism 
  of our media environment, to see a show in which being well-read, knowledgeable 
  and smart are all advantages at work and in life. But what the media giveth with one hand, they taketh away with the other, and 
  Ive come to recognize that media fare I enjoy usually has retrograde ideological 
  sludge lurking someplace deep within. The West Wing is no exception.  Millions of us have, over the past 15 years, been asked to do a lot more at 
  work in exactly the same amount of time, often with fewer resources. This speed-up 
  has often been accompanied, and made possible, by downsizing and layoffs. It 
  also imposes enormous stress on family and personal life. But were supposed 
  to feel that the busier we are, the more important we are, and tough shit for 
  those out there without a job. The West Wing celebrates liberal politics and even, at times, social justice. 
  Yet it also canonizes the expectation that staying late at work is more important 
  than going to your kids science fairor even seeing an old friend. | |