Rethinking ‘the Last Days of the Working Class’

Richard Greenwald

In Stayin’ Alive, Jefferson Cowie draws a surprising portrait of the 1970s

The 1970s are the Rodney Dangerfield of decades — they get no respect. Maybe it’s because those were the years in which I grew up and I am overly sensitive, but I doubt it’s just me. For so long, the 70s were the forgotten years between two eventful decades, the 60s and 80s, decades that had obvious political and social meaning. We know they mattered. But the 70s are more complicated. They should not be ignored as mere prelude or epilogue, and should not be so easily dismissed with a joke.

In recent years, there has been a new interest in the 70s, as scholarly books by Alice Echols (on disco and gender), Judith Stein (on political economy) and now Jefferson Cowie (on working-class culture) have joined others in redefining what we must now see as a pivotal decade. Cowie and others—including the various authors of Rebel Rank and File: Labor Militancy and Revolt From Below During the Long 1970s, reviewed on this site last weekare reclaiming the 70s, reminding us we have much to learn from the decade that gave us the hustle and Sweat Home Alabama.” 

Cowie’s Stayin’ Alive: The 1970s and the Last Days of the Working Class seeks to turn our understanding of the decade on its head. Combining an astute cultural reading of the times with one eye always turned to politics, Cowie unravels how America went from a nation with a strong union core, a luke-warm liberal consensus and a growing economy to a nation of rising unemployment, staggering inflation and de-industrialization.

In short, he asks: How did we get here from there?

The standard understanding of the 20th Century is to see it through the lens of what has been called the New Deal Order. Cowie reminds readers that the New Deal may not be the natural political state or norm we have come to believe. We must stop comparing every political moment to it in the hopes of imagining a new New Deal. If New Deal was the product of a specific set of historical circumstances, it ain’t coming back. 

Cowie is at his best, however, when writing about the working-class culture of the 70s. From Bruce Springsteen and Merle Haggard, to Saturday Night Fever and Dog Day Afternoon, to Archie Bunker, he explores the transformation of the working class as presented and represented in the mass media. We see working-class anger against unions and bosses and we see the claustrophobia of working-class life.

That seems to be the major theme Cowie finds in articles, books, working class voices and popular culture. There is a loss that seems so all-embracing that escape is the only option.

Cowie reminds us that the mass exodus of white working-class voters did not happen in 1980, but happened first in 1972. Labor, after all, did everything it could to help defeat McGovern in 1972 and many on the left never forgot. Nixon found a way to speak to the white working class in ways the Democrats had forgotten. The politics of culture and representation are central to understanding the decade. Class, always a fragile concept in American civic life, died the death of a thousand cuts in the 1970s…,” political, cultural and economic.

There are several turning points in this book, and plenty of blame to go around. One surprising section of the book deals with the movie Saturday Night Fever, a film I have always loathed. But Cowie’s keen analytical eye dissects the film exposing its larger cultural meaning. The movie’s theme is, as he writes, that Class is neither a community nor a culture nor occupation nor power but a mere affect that the select few, the chosen ones, can drop.”

He continues that class is some distant geographic or temporal past.” The metaphors that are critical for the decade are the loss of opportunity and the hope of escape. The heros of working-class culture, the Rockys and Tony Maneros, get out while they still can. They leave the working class behind.

Stayin’ Alive is an important book that needs to be read carefully by political activists, liberals, progressives and unionists. There are lessons that need to be learned about the power of culture that we cannot afford to ignore.

For Cowie, how a republic of anxiety overtook a republic of security may be the seventies’ greatest, and most tragic, legacy.”

Help In These Times Celebrate & Have Your Gift Matched!

In These Times is proud to share that we were recently awarded the 16th Annual Izzy Award from the Park Center for Independent Media at Ithaca College. The Izzy Award goes to an independent outlet, journalist or producer for contributions to culture, politics or journalism created outside traditional corporate structures.

Fellow 2024 Izzy awardees include Trina Reynolds-Tyler and Sarah Conway for their joint investigative series “Missing In Chicago," and journalists Mohammed El-Kurd and Lynzy Billing. The Izzy judges also gave special recognition to Democracy Now! for coverage that documented the destruction wreaked in Gaza and raised Palestinian voices to public awareness.

In These Times is proud to stand alongside our fellow awardees in accepting the 2024 Izzy Award. To help us continue producing award-winning journalism a generous donor has pledged to match any donation, dollar-for-dollar, up to $20,000.

Will you help In These Times celebrate and have your gift matched today? Make a tax-deductible contribution to support independent media.

Richard Greenwald is a labor historian and social critic. . His essays have appeared in In These Times, The Progressive, The Wall Street Journal among others. He is currently writing a book on the rise of freelancing and is co-editing a book on the future of work for The New Press, which features essays from the county’s leading labor scholars and public intellectuals.
Democratic Rep. Summer Lee, who at the time was a candidate for the state House, at a demonstration in Pittsburgh for Antwon Rose, who was killed by police, in 2018. Lee recently defeated her 2024 primary challenger.
Get 10 issues for $19.95

Subscribe to the print magazine.