Michael Abramowitz, Robin Wright and Thomas E. Ricks in WaPo report that, in his speech tonight, Bush will be overtly contradicting his own longstanding claims to let military commanders determine Iraq strategy. And that "some staff members on the National Security Council became enamored of the idea of sending more troops to Iraq in part because it was not a key feature of Baker-Hamilton" (the Iraq Study Group report). And that the whole point of the "surge" escalation is merely for public relations purposes rather than an actual attempt to accomplish any substantive goals. In the end, the White House favored the idea of more troops as one visible and dramatic step the administration could take. Paul Kiel at TPM Muckraker and Chris at AMERICAblog comment on the story.
More articles by Brian Zick
FBI Director Mueller Contradicts Gonzales
Brian Zick
Democrats Request Special Counsel Be Appointed to Investigate Perjury Charges Against Gonzales
Brian Zick
Rove and Deputy Jennings Subpoenaed by Senate Judiciary Committee
Brian Zick
Similar articles
ViewpointCulture
Big Back Panic: Fatphobia's Rebrand
Anti-fatness is back with a vengeance so aggressive it puts 1990s “heroin chic” to shame.
Tee Noir
FeatureInvestigationGoodman Institute
How Europe Outsourced Border Enforcement to Africa
The European Union is militarizing Africa's internal borders to curb migration, with little regard for human rights.
Andrei Popoviciu
FeatureInvestigationGoodman InstituteEn Español
Europa Está Externalizando su Represión Transfronteriza a África
La Unión Europea está militarizando las fronteras internas de África para frenar la migración.
Andrei Popoviciu