There’s reason to celebrate on Friday, when the federal minimum wage increases from $6.55 to $7.25.
About 4.5 million workers in 31 states will take home a bigger paycheck, and employers are likely to boost the pay of at least another 1.6 million just above the minimum wage, according to the Economic Policy Institute.
The other 19 states and the District of Columbia had already enacted minimums of $7.25 an hour or higher.
The increases should stimulate the economy, according to a new study
from the Chicago Federal Reserve Bank, and put a small dent in the growing inequality and poverty, but won’t likely increase unemployment.
Most of all, it will help the lives of a vulnerable population – mainly adults,
disproportionately minorities and women, who are the principal
breadwinners in their families, EPI reports.
But keep the celebration muted. The increase falls far short of what’s
needed. The real value of the minimum wage is still 17 percent lower
than in 1968, only 39 percent of the average nonsupervisory production
worker wage (and well below the ratio from the 1950s through the 1970s).
While the real minimum wage has shrunk, the typical minimum wage worker
has more education than her counterpart 30 years ago – and presumably
higher productivity, according to an analysis by EPI economists Andrew
Green and Heidi Shierholz.
.
In today’s dollars, workers in 1979 — 58 percent with a high-school degree
or more — made $8.02. But 72 percent of minimum wage workers now have
that level of education but less income.
And even with the new increase, the U.S. minimum wage lags far behind
Western European countries. In Britain, the minimum is $9.43 an hour. In
France, it’s $12.54. And both countries provide health insurance for
everyone through a national, public system.
Winning all that might justify a real party.
I hope you found this article important. Before you leave, I want to ask you to consider supporting our work with a donation. In These Times needs readers like you to help sustain our mission. We don’t depend on—or want—corporate advertising or deep-pocketed billionaires to fund our journalism. We’re supported by you, the reader, so we can focus on covering the issues that matter most to the progressive movement without fear or compromise.
Our work isn’t hidden behind a paywall because of people like you who support our journalism. We want to keep it that way. If you value the work we do and the movements we cover, please consider donating to In These Times.
David Moberg, a former senior editor of In These Times, was on staff with the magazine from when it began publishing in 1976 until his passing in July 2022. Before joining In These Times, he completed his work for a Ph.D. in anthropology at the University of Chicago and worked for Newsweek. He received fellowships from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and the Nation Institute for research on the new global economy.
