A Kentucky County Just Voted to Approve the First Local Right-to-Work Ordinance

Moshe Z. Marvit

Passing "right-to-work" laws at the state level has been a top priority for the Right in recent years. But where such laws might not be able to pass at the state level, local right-to-work ordinances may be on the horizon.

In recent months, a coalition of anti-union groups have been promoting the idea of passing right-to-work ordinances on the city and county level. Recognizing the success of progressives in pursuing labor rights at the local level, these anti-union groups have decided to try their own version of small-scale warfare.

I outlined the anti-union arguments and some of the associated problems in an article for The Nation. A few days later, Politico’s Brian Mahoney reported (paywalled) from ALEC’s winter meeting that specifically the groups are looking at counties in Washington, Montana, Wisconsin, Ohio, Pennsylvania and — perhaps most aggressively — Kentucky.”

Well, the ball just dropped. Last week, a county in southwestern Kentucky, approximately halfway between Louisville and Paducah, voted for preliminary approval of a county-level right-to-work ordinance.

The vote, reported by Katie Brandenburg of the Bowling Green Daily News, appeared to come out of nowhere. It was listed on the agenda as an Ordinance Relating to the Promotion of Economic Development and Commerce,” and one of the magistrates stated that he only found out about the ordinance on the morning of the vote.

If Warren County, Kentucky, takes the final step to passing its local right to work ordinance next week, it will represent the beginning of a long fight over the legality of such local laws. 

Promoters of the effort argue that although federal labor law generally preempts any local ordinances, Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act, which permits right-to-work laws in any state or territory,” is ambiguous as to whether it applies to cities and counties. They argue that counties are subdivisions of the state, and home rule cities have been delegated authority by the state, so these entities should be included under the term state.”

While I think the anti-union argument is wrong, this has all the earmarks of an eventual Supreme Court case in the making. And recent caess have already shown that the Court is capable of some truly anti-labor decisions.

This post firste appeared at The Century Foundation’s blog.

Help In These Times Celebrate & Have Your Gift Matched!

In These Times is proud to share that we were recently awarded the 16th Annual Izzy Award from the Park Center for Independent Media at Ithaca College. The Izzy Award goes to an independent outlet, journalist or producer for contributions to culture, politics or journalism created outside traditional corporate structures.

Fellow 2024 Izzy awardees include Trina Reynolds-Tyler and Sarah Conway for their joint investigative series “Missing In Chicago," and journalists Mohammed El-Kurd and Lynzy Billing. The Izzy judges also gave special recognition to Democracy Now! for coverage that documented the destruction wreaked in Gaza and raised Palestinian voices to public awareness.

In These Times is proud to stand alongside our fellow awardees in accepting the 2024 Izzy Award. To help us continue producing award-winning journalism a generous donor has pledged to match any donation, dollar-for-dollar, up to $20,000.

Will you help In These Times celebrate and have your gift matched today? Make a tax-deductible contribution to support independent media.

Moshe Z. Marvit is an attorney and fellow with The Century Foundation and the co-author (with Richard Kahlenberg) of the book Why Labor Organizing Should be a Civil Right.

The War on Protest Cover
Get 10 issues for $19.95

Subscribe to the print magazine.