Mark recommends that When Pelosi gets back from her trip, the House Foreign Affairs Committee ought to hold a hearing at which Pelosi and the Republican visitors to Damascus are invited to speak. If the Republicans show up, they should be asked about the White House role in setting up their trip.
(…)
That hearing could be followed by written questions, and if necessary subpoenas, to officials in the White House and the State Department asking the same questions: when did the White House know about the two trips? What role did it have in setting up the Republican trip? Did it make any effort to ask Pelosi and her colleagues privately not to go to Damascus before using the trip as political ammunition? What is the opinion of senior career diplomats about the impact of the trip? If it's such a bad idea to talk to the Syrians, why was Assistant Secretary of State Ellen Saurbrey sent to Damascus last month? Mark closes his post with this: It's time to rub the Bushies' noses in their lies, along with the noses of the journalists who supinely transmit those lies.
Please consider supporting our work.
I hope you found this article important. Before you leave, I want to ask you to consider supporting our work with a donation. In These Times needs readers like you to help sustain our mission. We don’t depend on—or want—corporate advertising or deep-pocketed billionaires to fund our journalism. We’re supported by you, the reader, so we can focus on covering the issues that matter most to the progressive movement without fear or compromise.
Our work isn’t hidden behind a paywall because of people like you who support our journalism. We want to keep it that way. If you value the work we do and the movements we cover, please consider donating to In These Times.
